Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
Development and Initial Validation of Phonation Quotient for Connected Speech: A Low-Cost, Indirect Aerodynamic
James A Curtis1,2, Leyla E Jimenez3,4, Isabel M Aberin-Angulo3,4
1Aerodigestive Innovations Research Lab (AIR), Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA, yrj9003@med.cornell.edu.
Introduction:
The phonation quotient derived from a sustained vowel (PQ-SV) is a valid, low-cost estimate of phonatory airflow but may not reflect the aerodynamic demands of connected speech. This study introduces the phonation quotient for connected speech (PQ-CS), a novel extension of PQ-SV, and evaluates its initial validity by examining (1) the relationship between PQ-CS and directly measured airflow during connected speech; (2) physiologic relationships among PQ-CS component measures; and (3) whether PQ-CS or PQ-SV demonstrates stronger associations with airflow across connected speech and sustained vowel tasks.
Methods:
Thirty adults without structural laryngeal pathology completed vital capacity maneuvers; comfortably spoken and maximum phonation of a sustained vowel (/a/); and comfortably spoken and maximum phonation of continuously repeated productions of the voiced sentence "We were away a year ago." Time, volume, and airflow were measured using the Phonatory Aerodynamic System. PQ-CS and PQ-SV were calculated as vital capacity divided by maximum phonation time for the connected speech and sustained vowel tasks, respectively. Associations were evaluated using simple linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients.
Results:
PQ-CS demonstrated significant positive associations with mean flow rate during both the maximum phonation connected speech task (r = 0.57) and the comfortably spoken connected speech task (r = 0.41). PQ-CS component measures exhibited expected physiologic relationships, including strong associations between vital capacity and phonation volume (r = 0.62) and a negative association between task duration and mean flow rate (r = -0.37). Across connected speech tasks, PQ-CS showed stronger associations with airflow than PQ-SV. In contrast, PQ-SV demonstrated the strongest association with airflow during maximum sustained vowel phonation, whereas PQ-CS showed a stronger association during comfortably sustained vowel production.
Conclusion:
PQ-CS is a valid, physiologically grounded, and clinically feasible indirect measure of phonatory airflow during connected speech. Together, PQ-CS and PQ-SV provide complementary aerodynamic information that may enhance clinical voice assessment when specialized equipment is unavailable.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:

