Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

The TreadWheel: Interval Training Protocol for Gently Induced Exercise in Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: June 8, 2018
Microdosing of Flywheel Training: Effects of Low Versus High Training Frequency on Muscle Mass, Strength, and Power
Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo1,2, Marina Gómez1,2, Susana López-Ortiz1
1i+HeALTH Strategic Research Group, Department of Health Sciences,Miguel de Cervantes European University (UEMC), Valladolid, Spain.
Purpose:
This study compared the effects of low-frequency flywheel resistance training (FRT, 1 session/week) and microdosing FRT (5 sessions/week) on muscle architecture, strength, and vertical jump performance in active individuals.
Methods:
Thirty participants were randomized into a microdosing group (MDG, n = 15) or a control group (CG, n = 15). Both groups completed equalized weekly training volumes (30 sets over 6 wk) using a flywheel leg press. The MDG performed one set daily, whereas the CG performed 5 sets once weekly. Vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle thickness, vastus lateralis fascicle length and angle, maximal voluntary isometric contraction in the half-squat exercise, countermovement and drop jump performance, rating of perceived exertion, and delayed-onset muscle soreness were assessed preintervention and postintervention.
Results:
MDG showed significant (P < .001) increases in muscle thickness (vastus lateralis: 9.8%, 0.21 cm, effect size [ES] = 0.41; and rectus femoris: 7.9%, 0.18 cm, ES = 0.34), fascicle length (11.8%, 0.96 cm, ES = 0.81), and fascicle angle (14.2%, 2.29°, ES = 1.16), drop jump RSI (24.4%, ES = 0.97), and drop jump take-off velocity (5.7%, ES = 0.27) while CG showed no significant changes. Both groups showed improved maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MDG: 27.4%, ES = 0.72; CG: 18.6%; ES = 0.48), countermovement height (MDG, 7.7%, ES = 0.34; CG: 5.9%, ES = 0.17), and countermovement mRSI (MDG, 32.1%, ES = 0.98; CG: 34.0%, ES = 0.60) with no intergroup differences. However, MDG reported significantly (P < .001) lower rating of perceived exertion and delayed-onset muscle soreness scores throughout the intervention.
Conclusions:
FRT microdosing improved muscle architecture, while strength and power gains were similar to low-frequency FRT. Importantly, microdosing reduced fatigue and soreness, offering a practical alternative during competitive congested schedules or in rehabilitation settings.
Related Concept Videos
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...

