Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

Associative Learning

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Distinct patterns of social contagion under risk and ambiguity.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Hybrid neural-cognitive models reveal how memory shapes human reward learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Same author

Shared sensitivity to data distribution during learning in humans and transformer networks.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

The levers of political persuasion with conversational artificial intelligence.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Same author

Humans and neural networks show similar patterns of transfer and interference during continual learning.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Human curriculum learning of a cue combination task.

Qingtian Mi¹, Christopher Summerfield²

¹Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. qingtian.mi@psy.ox.ac.uk.

Nature Human Behaviour

|May 5, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Breaking down problems into parts improves human learning. A new hybrid learning framework explains how presenting cues individually boosts performance on complex tasks, accelerating learning.

More Related Videos

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Computational Neuroscience
Machine Learning

Background:

Humans intuitively learn complex tasks better when problems are simplified.
The computational mechanisms underlying this 'divide and conquer' learning strategy remain unclear.
Probabilistic cue combination tasks are widely used to study human learning and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how different training curricula impact learning in probabilistic cue combination tasks.
To develop a computational model explaining how structured training enhances human learning.
To test the predictive power of the model in designing effective learning curricula.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of learning outcomes under different training curricula (single-cue vs. multi-cue).
Development of a hybrid computational learning framework integrating marginal and joint updating processes.
Experimental validation using human participants and novel 'skewed distribution' training curricula.

Main Results:

Training curricula that present cues individually ('divide and conquer') significantly improve subsequent multi-cue learning.
The hybrid learning framework accurately captures the observed learning enhancements.
The model successfully predicts which novel curricula will facilitate or hinder human learning.

Conclusions:

A hybrid learning approach, balancing individual cue assessment and joint cue evaluation, is key to efficient probabilistic learning.
Computational insights into learning strategies can be leveraged to design more effective educational and training interventions.
Structured training curricula can significantly accelerate human learning in complex probabilistic environments.