27-gauge direct endoillumination-assisted scleral buckling using a heads-up 3D visualization system: surgical feasibility and outcomes in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Intraoperative Visualization of Subretinal Injection and Retinal Detachment in Rats
Published on: March 7, 2025
Ming-Chieh Hsieh1,2, Yi-Jye Chen2, Hung-Yin Lai1,2
1The Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Background:
To evaluate the feasibility, anatomical outcomes, visual results, and safety profile of a modified scleral buckling (SB) technique utilizing 27-gauge direct endoillumination under a heads-up three-dimensional (3D) visualization system for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
Methods:
This retrospective case series included consecutive patients with primary RRD who underwent modified SB surgery at a tertiary referral center. Retinal breaks were identified using a 27-gauge endoillumination probe through a valved trocar under a heads-up 3D visualization system with a non-contact wide-angle viewing lens. Anatomical success after a single surgery was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and surgical complications.
Results:
Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients were included, with a mean age of 34.6 ± 12.1 years. Fifteen eyes (56%) were macula-off at presentation. Single-surgery anatomical success was achieved in all cases during a mean follow-up of 9.4 ± 5.9 months. Mean BCVA improved significantly from 0.57 ± 0.55 logMAR preoperatively to 0.21 ± 0.30 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.001). Twelve eyes (44.4%) achieved a final visual acuity of 20/20. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications, including endophthalmitis, iatrogenic retinal breaks, cataract formation, or vitreous prolapse, were observed.
Conclusions:
This modified SB technique using 27-gauge direct endoillumination and heads-up 3D visualization appears to be a feasible and safe approach for selected cases of primary RRD, demonstrating encouraging anatomical and functional outcomes. However, given the retrospective design, small sample size, and absence of a control group, further prospective comparative studies are warranted to validate these findings.

