Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
Published on: February 28, 2021
Feature representation for explainable CRISPR off-target prediction and base editing efficiency
Faiza Hasin1,2, Michele Minervini1, Corrado Mencar1,2
1Department of Computer Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Introduction:
The interaction between guide RNAs (gRNAs) and target DNA sequences is a critical factor in the effectiveness of CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) gene editing. Predicting these interactions accurately necessitates models that offer biological knowledge in addition to high accuracy. This study analyzes the impact of feature representation on accuracy and interpretability in off-target prediction.
Methods:
We address two CRISPR applications: gene knockout (KO) and base editing (BE) using distinct benchmark datasets. For the KO problem, we utilized CHANGE-seq and GUIDE-seq to evaluate paired sequence representations, while the Hanna screening dataset has been used for BE. We approached the prediction problem both as a classification and regression task using XGBoost models.
Results:
In the case of KO, there is not a single universally optimal encoding. For both classification and regression, One-Hot and its variants (OH, OH5C) achieve the best results on GUIDE-seq (AUPR = 0.661, Pearson = 0.756), while the Bulges representation performs best on CHANGE-seq (AUPR = 0.612, Pearson = 0.602). In the case of BE, One-hot encoding consistently outperforms K-mer representation for predictive accuracy both as regression and classification (AUPR = 0.723, Pearson = 0.746).
Discussion:
Our analysis demonstrates comparable predictive performance across both gene knockout and base editing tasks, confirming the robustness of the framework in distinct editing domains. Interpretability analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) reveals that despite different mechanisms, the Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM)-proximal region remains a critical feature for prediction for both editing mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
CRISPR
CRISPR
Homologous Recombination
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...

