Role of funders in embedding tests in conservation practice

Area of Science:

• Conservation science
• Biodiversity research
• Evidence-based practice

Background:

• Effective conservation relies on robust evidence, yet significant gaps persist in the current knowledge base.
• Integrating rigorous testing of conservation interventions is crucial for accelerating evidence generation.
• Conservation project funders have a key role in promoting and supporting such evidence-based approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

• To identify actionable strategies for conservation funders to enhance evidence generation.
• To explore how funders can incentivize the inclusion of effectiveness testing in conservation projects.
• To outline approaches for embedding scientific testing within the grant-making process.

Main Methods:

• A structured process involving 25 conservation funders and Conservation Evidence members.
• Identification of various methods for funders to support the integration of testing.
• Discussion of barriers and potential solutions for implementing effectiveness tests.

Main Results:

• Eleven distinct approaches were identified for funders to support testing within conservation projects.
• Funders can encourage testing via proposals, dedicated funding, or external support units.
• Barriers include skill gaps and time constraints, with potential solutions proposed.

Conclusions:

• Funders can significantly improve conservation effectiveness by supporting the generation of reliable evidence.
• Incentivizing testing leads to better decision-making and improved outcomes for biodiversity and society.
• Tailored approaches are needed based on funding scale, process, and project type.