Validation and Early Application of the ProVent Score in a Contemporary ICU Cohort
Shihla Shireen Kanamgode1, Eric Cucchi1, Stephen Anders1
1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract:
BackgroundProlonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) is associated with poor long-term outcomes. The ProVent14 score was developed to estimate one-year mortality among patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 14 days. However, contemporary validation of the model and its performance earlier during mechanical ventilation remain uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the validity of the ProVent14 score in a modern ICU cohort and assess its predictive performance when applied earlier during mechanical ventilation.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database (2008-2022). Adult ICU admissions receiving at least seven days of mechanical ventilation were included. Patients with chronic neuromuscular disease, extensive burns, or chronic mechanical ventilation were excluded. Three non-mutually exclusive cohorts were constructed based on duration of ventilation (≥7,≥10, and ≥14 days). Predictors from the original ProVent14 model (age, platelet count, vasopressor use, hemodialysis requirement, and trauma admission status) were assessed at each time point. The primary outcome was one-year mortality from the onset of prolonged ventilation. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: A total of 1344, 634, and 249 patients comprised the day-7, day-10, and day-14 cohorts, respectively. One-year mortality ranged from 64% to 67% across cohorts. The ProVent model demonstrated consistent discrimination at day 7, day 10, and day 14 (AUC 0.74, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively) with acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P-values 0.50, 0.18, and 0.21). Model performance remained stable across different study periods. Conclusions: The ProVent score maintains stable predictive performance in a contemporary ICU population. Similar discrimination and calibration at days 7 and 10 suggest that prognostic assessment may be feasible earlier during mechanical ventilation.
Insights
The ProVent score accurately predicts one-year mortality in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). This score shows stable performance even when applied earlier, offering valuable prognostic insights for critical care.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pulmonology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) is linked to adverse long-term health outcomes.
- The ProVent14 score was developed to estimate 1-year mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 14 days.
- Contemporary validation and early performance of the ProVent14 score remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the ProVent14 score in a modern intensive care unit (ICU) cohort.
- To assess the predictive performance of the ProVent14 score when applied earlier in the course of mechanical ventilation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2022).
- Included adult ICU admissions with ≥7 days of mechanical ventilation, excluding specific conditions.
- Constructed cohorts based on ventilation duration (≥7, ≥10, ≥14 days) and evaluated ProVent14 predictors at each time point.
Main Results:
- The ProVent model demonstrated consistent discrimination across day 7, day 10, and day 14 cohorts (AUCs 0.74, 0.72, 0.71, respectively).
- Calibration was acceptable in all cohorts (Hosmer-Lemeshow P-values > 0.05).
- One-year mortality ranged from 64% to 67% across the different ventilation duration cohorts.
Conclusions:
- The ProVent score maintains stable predictive performance in a contemporary ICU population.
- Prognostic assessment using the ProVent score appears feasible earlier than day 14, specifically at days 7 and 10.
- The findings support the utility of the ProVent score for early risk stratification in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:

