Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.

In- and Out-Groups

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Groupthink

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...

Self-Serving Bias

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...

Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting

Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting

Altercasting is a strategic communication technique in which an individual imposes a specific identity or social role onto another person to influence their behavior and shape the interaction. By presuming a role—such as “responsible leader” or “patient person”—altercasting encourages the target to conform to that identity, often aligning their behavior with the expectations associated with the role. The power of this tactic lies in its subtlety; once a role is assigned, it becomes socially...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Same author

How sharing is the "sharing economy"? Evidence from 97 Airbnb markets.

PloS one·2022

Same author

Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.

PloS one·2021

Same author

Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion.

PloS one·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Echo chambers can emerge without algorithmic personalization or a preference for homogeneity.

Petter Törnberg¹

¹ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

|May 6, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Online echo chambers can form without algorithms or user preference. Cascading exits from disagreement drive segregation, a dynamic potentially mitigated by personalization. This highlights complex online polarization drivers.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

Computational Social Science
Sociology
Network Science

Background:

Online ideological segregation, or "echo chambers," is often blamed on algorithmic personalization (filter bubbles) or user preference for like-minded groups.
Existing theories do not fully explain the emergence of segregation in online environments.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and test a novel mechanism for online ideological segregation.
To investigate the role of user exit dynamics in creating and reinforcing echo chambers.
To explore how algorithmic personalization interacts with user behavior to influence segregation.

Main Methods:

Development of a minimal agent-based model to simulate user interactions and community exits.
Analysis of cascading exit dynamics and self-reinforcing sorting processes.
Longitudinal analysis of user language and exit behavior in the subreddit r/MensRights as an empirical case study.

Main Results:

Strong ideological segregation can emerge organically from user exit dynamics, even without algorithmic personalization or explicit preference for homogeneity.
Cascading exits, triggered by encountering disagreement, can lead to highly homogeneous communities.
Algorithmic personalization can, under certain conditions, reduce segregation by mitigating user dissatisfaction and stabilizing mixed communities.
Empirical data from r/MensRights supports the model, showing users with language distant from the community center are more likely to exit.

Conclusions:

Online echo chambers can arise from the inherent dynamics of user exits and regrouping, independent of personalization or homophily.
Interventions targeting individual exposure may have unintended aggregate consequences on polarization.
Understanding these exit dynamics is crucial for addressing online polarization and informing platform design and policy.