Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
Published on: June 29, 2021
The effects of intelligibility on conflict resolution and monitoring during speech recognition in noise
Susan Teubner-Rhodes1, Anna Pusser2, Rebecca Dunterman2
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. teubner@auburn.edu.
Abstract:
Listeners have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, confusing similar sounding words. Cognitive control may be important for segregating the speech signal from background noise and/or selecting between phonological competitors in the mental lexicon. Although cognitive control abilities may be related to speech recognition in noise, the extent to which engaging cognitive control causally improves speech recognition in background noise is unclear. The present study presented pictures that matched (congruent trials) or were phonological neighbors (incongruent trials) of the spoken word to manipulate cognitive control during speech recognition in multitalker babble at + 6 and + 8 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). As conflict increases cognitive control levels, performance following incongruent trials indexes the effect of cognitive control on recognizing speech in noise. Following conflict, participants became faster and more accurate at repeating back speech at + 6 dB SNR and more accurate at + 8 dB SNR. When comparing across SNRs (including a + 4 dB SNR from a previous study), higher SNRs reduced the interference effect, predicting better recognition on incongruent trials; however, SNR did not significantly modulate postconflict improvements in word recognition. Results suggest engaging cognitive control improves speech recognition in noise across SNR levels where recognition is challenging but possible.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sound Waves: Interference
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Non-Verbal Cues
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...