Utility of a Multiplex Molecular Respiratory Pathogen Panel on Clinical Management of Children in the Pediatric

Samuel M Goodfellow1, Jennifer Dien Bard2, Vivian Lee3

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Insights

Rapid respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) in pediatric emergency departments did not significantly alter clinical management for children with acute respiratory infections. Implementing stewardship criteria could reduce unnecessary RPP testing by 48%.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Infectious Disease Diagnostics
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are a leading cause of pediatric emergency department (PED) visits.
  • Rapid molecular respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) are increasingly used in diagnosing pediatric ARI.
  • The clinical utility and impact of RPPs on management in the PED require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of RPPs on the clinical management of children in the PED.
  • To assess the effect of implementing restrictive criteria for RPP orders.
  • To determine if RPP results influence disease severity assessment or treatment decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of PED RPP orders from June 2023 to June 2024.
  • Inclusion of 400 patients (infants <1 year, children 1-5 years) with even RPP positive/negative distribution.
  • Chart abstraction for clinical presentation, management, and disease severity (Emergency Severity Index).

Main Results:

  • Of 2,052 RPPs performed, 71.3% were positive for at least one target.
  • No significant differences in disease severity (ESI 3.7) or clinical management were observed between RPP positive and negative patients.
  • Retrospective application of stewardship criteria suggested a potential 48% reduction in RPP testing.

Conclusions:

  • RPP results, whether positive or negative, had a limited impact on clinical management decisions in the PED.
  • Stewardship interventions show potential for reducing unnecessary RPP testing and associated costs.
  • Optimizing RPP utilization is crucial for cost-effectiveness while ensuring identification of critical pathogens.