Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Development of Multiplex Real-Time RT-qPCR Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and MERS-CoV
Published on: November 10, 2023
Utility of a Multiplex Molecular Respiratory Pathogen Panel on Clinical Management of Children in the Pediatric
Samuel M Goodfellow1, Jennifer Dien Bard2, Vivian Lee3
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Insights
Rapid respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) in pediatric emergency departments did not significantly alter clinical management for children with acute respiratory infections. Implementing stewardship criteria could reduce unnecessary RPP testing by 48%.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Infectious Disease Diagnostics
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are a leading cause of pediatric emergency department (PED) visits.
- Rapid molecular respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) are increasingly used in diagnosing pediatric ARI.
- The clinical utility and impact of RPPs on management in the PED require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of RPPs on the clinical management of children in the PED.
- To assess the effect of implementing restrictive criteria for RPP orders.
- To determine if RPP results influence disease severity assessment or treatment decisions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of PED RPP orders from June 2023 to June 2024.
- Inclusion of 400 patients (infants <1 year, children 1-5 years) with even RPP positive/negative distribution.
- Chart abstraction for clinical presentation, management, and disease severity (Emergency Severity Index).
Main Results:
- Of 2,052 RPPs performed, 71.3% were positive for at least one target.
- No significant differences in disease severity (ESI 3.7) or clinical management were observed between RPP positive and negative patients.
- Retrospective application of stewardship criteria suggested a potential 48% reduction in RPP testing.
Conclusions:
- RPP results, whether positive or negative, had a limited impact on clinical management decisions in the PED.
- Stewardship interventions show potential for reducing unnecessary RPP testing and associated costs.
- Optimizing RPP utilization is crucial for cost-effectiveness while ensuring identification of critical pathogens.
Abstract:
Acute respiratory infections in children contribute to a significant volume of pediatric emergency department (PED) visits annually. Rapid molecular respiratory pathogen panels (RPPs) have increasingly been integrated into diagnostic workup. This study aims to investigate RPPs' impact on clinical management of children presenting to the PED and the effect of implementing restrictive criteria for RPP orders. Retrospective analysis of PED RPP orders from June 2023 through June 2024 was performed with a randomized subset of 400 patients in two cohorts (infants <1 year old and children 1 to 5 years old) selected for in-depth chart abstraction, including clinical presentation and management, with even distribution of RPP-positive and RPP-negative patients. Of 2052 RPPs performed from children age 5 years or younger, 1464 (71.3%) were positive for one or more targets. Regardless of RPP result or patient age, no significant differences in disease severity (mean Emergency Severity Index of 3.7 versus 3.7) or clinical management (infants, 6.0%; young children, 5.0%) were observed. Applying stewardship criteria retrospectively to both cohorts demonstrated a potential 48% reduction in unnecessary testing by RPP. RPP results, positive or negative for one or more targets, had limited impact on clinical management in the PED. The data support the potential value of stewardship intervention to reduce cost while maintaining critical pathogen identification.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
