Beta-blockers after myocardial infarction with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: existing evidence,

Shujuan Zhao1, Chiwei Guo1, Haixia Cai1

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Insights

Beta-blockers (BBs) are not beneficial for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). However, BBs may offer benefits for those with mildly reduced EF.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Beta-blockers (BBs) have been a standard treatment for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI).
  • Recent evidence questions long-term BB use in patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
  • This is particularly relevant in the context of modern treatments like percutaneous coronary intervention and guideline-directed medical therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of beta-blocker (BB) therapy in patients post-myocardial infarction (MI).
  • To assess outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in contemporary practice.
  • To review current North American and European guidelines regarding BB use after MI.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials and two meta-analyses.
  • Evaluation of BB therapy in post-MI patients with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF.
  • Critical appraisal of trial designs, endpoints, outcomes, and guideline recommendations.

Main Results:

  • In patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%), BB therapy showed no significant reduction in death, MI, or heart failure (P = 0.54).
  • In patients with mildly reduced LVEF (40%-49%), BB therapy was associated with a 25% relative risk reduction in the composite endpoint (P = 0.031) without heterogeneity.
  • Safety profiles were similar between BB and no-BB groups.

Conclusions:

  • An EF-stratified approach to BB therapy post-MI is supported by contemporary evidence.
  • Routine long-term BB use may not be justified for patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) unless other indications exist.
  • BB therapy may be considered for patients with mildly reduced LVEF (40%-49%) after MI.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers01:22

Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

β-adrenergic antagonists, commonly known as β-blockers, block the effects of sympathetic neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (ADR). They have several beneficial effects in heart failure treatment. They reduce heart rate, the force of contraction, and cardiac muscle relaxation. They also slow the atrial-ventricular conduction rate and raise the threshold for arrhythmias. The concentration of β-blockers determines their effects on bronchodilation, vasodilation, and...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management01:30

Heart Failure V: Medical Management

Medical Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)The primary goals of therapy for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include:Relieving symptomsOptimizing volume statusSupporting oxygenation and ventilationMaintaining cardiac output (CO) and end-organ perfusionIdentifying and addressing the cause of ADHFPreventing complicationsProviding patient education on factors precipitating HF exacerbationPlanning for dischargeOngoing monitoring and assessment...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System01:26

Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

The activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) contributes to cardiac remodeling, and inhibiting the RAAS is a pharmacological target in heart failure management. As a result, neurohumoral modulation is a crucial treatment principle for managing heart failure. This approach involves using medications like ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and neutral...
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers01:31

Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers

Third-generation β-blockers, such as labetalol and carvedilol, represent a significant advancement in managing cardiovascular conditions. Unlike conventional β-blockers, which can induce peripheral vasoconstriction, third-generation drugs block α1 adrenoceptors. This promotes vasodilation through several mechanisms, such as increased nitric oxide production, inhibition of calcium ion entry, opening of potassium ion channels, and antioxidant action. Labetalol, for instance, is clinically...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers01:27

Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers

β-receptor blockers significantly impact the cardiovascular system by counteracting catecholamine-induced sympathetic responses. These medications decrease heart rate, contractility, and cardiac output, potentially leading to cardiac depression, life-threatening bradycardia, and death. Therapeutically, β-blockers function as mild antihypertensives and are utilized in treating angina pectoris and cardiac arrhythmias. However, nonselective β-blockers inhibit β2-receptors in bronchial smooth...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers01:25

Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers

β-adrenergic antagonists, or β-blockers, modulate the sympathetic nervous system by targeting β-adrenoceptors and inhibiting catecholamine-mediated sympathetic responses. β-blockers differ in their adrenoceptor subtype affinity, lipophilicity, and α-blocking capabilities. The history of β-blocker development began with the prototype, dichloroisoprenaline, which exhibited partial agonist activity. As a result, propranolol was developed as a pure antagonist but nonselective agent, paving the way...