Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules
Published on: May 19, 2023
Development and validation of a nomogram using interpretable machine learning to integrate CT radiomics and PET
Xue Liu1, Xinghua Liu2, Li Bin1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.
Objective:
To construct a multimodal machine learning model integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomics, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) metabolic parameters, and clinical data for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary space-occupying lesions (PSOLs), and develop an interpretable nomogram for clinical application.
Methodology:
This study enrolled 384 patients with PSOLs who underwent dual-time-point 1⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations. The cohort was divided into a training set (n = 268, 145 malignant, 123 benign) and an independent temporal validation set (n = 116, 69 malignant, 47 benign) at a 7:3 ratio according to the chronological order of patient enrollment, to avoid data leakage and rigorously assess model generalizability. All malignant lesions were confirmed by pathological examination, while benign lesions were confirmed by pathology (82%) or clinical-imaging follow-up for at least 12 months (18%). CT radiomic features with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values >0.75 were selected, and a Radiomics-score (Rad-score) was generated using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression algorithm. Integrated models [Logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] were developed by fusing the Rad-score, clinical variables, and PET metabolic parameters. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Brier score. Model calibration was assessed via calibration curves, and clinical utility was validated by decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was achieved using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values for the optimal XGBoost model, and a clinically applicable, interpretable nomogram was constructed based on the core predictive features identified by SHAP analysis to facilitate clinical translation.
Results:
A Rad-score was constructed from 17 optimally selected features. In the independent temporal validation set, the single-modality models achieved AUCs of 0.808 (Radiomics Model), 0.732 (Clinical Model), and 0.874 (Metabolic Model). Among all tested models, the XGBoost integrated model achieved the highest AUC of 0.967, which was significantly higher than that of all other models (Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.002-0.032, all adjusted P < 0.05). SHAP analysis identified ΔSUVmax, Rad-score, and delayed phase total lesion glycolysis (TLG_d) as the top three key predictive features.
Conclusions:
The predictive logic of the optimal XGBoost model was decoded via SHAP analysis to identify core predictive features, and a clinically applicable, interpretable nomogram was further established based on a multivariate logistic regression model using these core features, to facilitate the clinical translation of our model.
