Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Venous Thrombosis Assay in a Mouse Model of Cancer
Published on: January 5, 2024
Prothrombotic genetic variants and cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: defining thrombotic risk across tumor
Hannah Stevens1, William W H Ho2, Manika Singh2
1Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Baker Department of Cardiometabolic Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Haematology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania. Hannah.stevens@baker.edu.au.
Abstract:
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is a major cause of mortality in cancer patients. Prothrombotic genetic variants increase venous thromboembolism risk in the general population, but contribution to CAT remains unclear, particularly within different tumor types. We sought to determine whether the presence of thrombophilic variants influence relative and absolute CAT risk, and may be utilised in thromboprophylaxis decision-making. We evaluated 398,053 UK Biobank participants, of whom 42,122 developed cancer. A panel of seven thrombophilic variants (ABO, FGG, FXI, FVL, PTM, SLC44A2 and TSPAN15) were evaluated using multistate models, and 2-year absolute risk was estimated using Aalen- Johansen methods. We report hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. CAT incidence was 7.82% versus 2.08% in non-cancer participants. In the non-cancer population, all seven variants were associated with a higher risk of VTE. In patients with cancer, FVL conferred the highest risk (HR 1.81 for one risk allele; HR 5.75 for two risk alleles), followed by SLC44A2 (HR 1.51 for one risk allele, 1.53 for two risk alleles). Genetic effects were greatest in high-risk cancers, including pancreatic and lung cancers. For FVL heterozygotes, 2-year absolute VTE risk approximately doubled in several malignancies, including 5.17% to 9.26% in colorectal cancer and from 4.16% to 10.59% in lymphoma. In conclusion, thrombophilic variants, particularly FVL and SLC44A2, significantly increase the relative risk of CAT, with the largest effects in high-risk cancers. FVL has a marked impact on absolute CAT risk. Integrating genetic variants with clinical predictors can improve personalized thromboprophylaxis strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...