Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
Relationships Among Auditory Discrimination, Adaptive Vocal Learning, and Perilaryngeal Muscle Activation in People
Mara R Kapsner-Smith1,2, Manuel Díaz Cádiz2, Madeline Knutson1,3
1Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
People with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) show distinct auditory-motor impairments for pitch versus loudness. This suggests separate neural control mechanisms for vocal frequency and intensity regulation.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
- Neuroscience
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) are characterized by abnormal vocal fold function, often linked to motor control deficits.
- Auditory-motor integration is crucial for voice regulation, but its specificity in HVDs remains unclear.
- Perilaryngeal muscle activity patterns during voicing may reflect underlying control strategies in HVDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specificity of auditory-motor impairment in HVDs.
- To explore the relationship between HVDs, perilaryngeal muscle activation, and adaptive vocal learning.
- To measure muscle activity during adaptive vocal learning for intensity and fundamental frequency (f₀).
Main Methods:
- Fifty-two participants (26 HVDs, 26 controls) performed auditory discrimination and adaptive vocal learning tasks for intensity and f₀.
- Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded activity from suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles.
- Co-contraction index (CCI) was analyzed, along with mediation models examining relationships between variables.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in discrimination thresholds between HVDs and controls.
- HVDs showed greater adaptation to intensity perturbations; singers adapted less.
- More individuals with HVDs exhibited large following responses for f₀ adaptation compared to controls.
- No significant effects of HVD status on CCI, but moderate relationships found between discrimination, CCI, and f₀ adaptation.
Conclusions:
- HVDs exhibit distinct auditory feedback integration deficits for f₀ versus intensity, suggesting independent control mechanisms.
- Preliminary evidence indicates a laryngeal stabilization response to perceived external feedback mismatch.
- Findings highlight the complexity of auditory-motor control in voice disorders.
More Related Videos
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
11:15fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals
Published on: May 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Larynx
Anatomy of the Larynx
The larynx consists of various components, including cartilage, muscles, and vocal cords. Its structure includes three large unpaired cartilages—the thyroid, cricoid, and epiglottis—and three smaller paired cartilages—the arytenoids, corniculates, and...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...