Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
Relationships Among Auditory Discrimination, Adaptive Vocal Learning, and Perilaryngeal Muscle Activation in People
Mara R Kapsner-Smith1,2, Manuel Díaz Cádiz2, Madeline Knutson1,3
1Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Purpose:
We investigated the specificity of auditory-motor impairment in people with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) and relationships with dysregulated perilaryngeal muscle activation during voicing by measuring muscle activity during adaptive vocal learning.
Method:
Fifty-two participants (26 HVDs, 26 controls) completed auditory discrimination and adaptive vocal learning tasks for the vocal parameters intensity and fundamental frequency (fo). Surface electromyographic measures were collected from suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles. We examined the effects of HVD status and singing experience on discrimination and adaptation. The effects of HVD status, vocal parameter, and time on the co-contraction index (CCI), a measure of co-activation of agonist/antagonist muscles, were also investigated. Relationships among dependent variables were examined using a mediation model.
Results:
There were no significant effects of HVD status or singing on discrimination thresholds. People with HVDs adapted more to intensity perturbations than controls (p = .050), and singers adapted significantly less than nonsingers (p = .018). For fo adaptation, significantly more participants with HVDs produced large following responses than controls (p = .017). There were no significant effects of time, vocal parameter, or HVD status on CCI. However, significant moderate relationships were found between discrimination threshold, CCI, and adaptation responses for fo. Participants with better discrimination compensated less or followed the perturbation and co-contracted more. Participants who co-contracted more also compensated less or followed the perturbation. No significant relationships were found for vocal intensity.
Conclusions:
People with HVDs demonstrated different impairments in auditory feedback integration for fo versus intensity. This dissociation suggests an independence of the underlying control mechanisms. Preliminary evidence suggests a laryngeal stabilization response may occur when a speaker perceives a feedback mismatch to be externally generated.
Supplemental Material:
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32114905.
More Related Videos
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
11:15fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals
Published on: May 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Larynx
Anatomy of the Larynx
The larynx consists of various components, including cartilage, muscles, and vocal cords. Its structure includes three large unpaired cartilages—the thyroid, cricoid, and epiglottis—and three smaller paired cartilages—the arytenoids, corniculates, and...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...