Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Characterization of Sickling During Controlled Automated Deoxygenation with Oxygen Gradient Ektacytometry
Published on: November 5, 2019
Should we longitudinally monitor blood viscosity in patients with sickle cell anemia?
Philippe Connes1, Marie Martin1, Judith Catella2
1Laboratory LIBM UR7424, Vascular Biology and Red Blood Cell Team, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Abstract:
Blood viscosity is recognized as a key determinant in the pathophysiology of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) in sickle cell anemia (SCA). However, its longitudinal relationship with changes in VOC frequency over time remains poorly understood. The present study analyzed the associations between the changes in blood rheological parameters and the changes (delta) in the rate of VOC over time in 63 SCA patients. VOC rates (calculated over the 3 years preceding each blood sampling) and biological parameters were measured at two separate occasions, spaced by at least 3 yrs. (mean difference between the two measurements: 5.7 ± 2.0 years). A positive correlation was observed between the delta-VOC rate and the percentages of change in white blood cells, lactate dehydrogenase and blood viscosity. A multivariate linear regression was performed to test the independent association between the delta-VOC rate and the percentages of change in these biological parameters. The model was statistically significant (R2 = 0.47, p < 0.01), and blood viscosity was the only parameter independently associated with the percentage of change in VOC rate (β coefficient = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.009-0.040, p < 0.01). Our study demonstrated that steady-state blood viscosity is a valuable biomarker in SCA, given its associations with temporal variations of VOC frequency.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
