Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients with Medically-refractory Essential Tremor
Published on: December 13, 2017
Improved Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium-Prepared Inversion Recovery TSE Sequence for Ulnar Nerve MR Neurography
Guanghui Hong1, Junhuan Hong1, Dongmei Jiang1
1From the Department of Radiology (J.H., D.J., X.L., Y.P., P.H., M.T., D.S.), Neurosurgery (G.H.), Key Laboratory of Radiation Biology of Fujian higher education institutions (D.S.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China; Department of Radiology (J.H., D.J., X.L., Y.P., P.H., M.T., D.S.), Neurosurgery (G.H.), National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350212, China and The School of Medical Imaging (J.H.), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350122, China.
Background And Purpose:
Conventional inversion recovery TSE for ulnar neuropathy has limited venous and muscle suppression, requiring contrast agents. Improved motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (iMSDE) utilizes T2 magnetization preparatory pulse and diffuse gradient field to suppress venous and muscle signal. This study aimed to evaluate ability of inversion recovery TSE with iMSDE for visualizing ulnar neuropathy.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-nine patients (52.3 ± 15.8 years; 17 men) with suspected ulnar neuropathy at the elbow underwent 3T MRI including non-contrast, contrast-enhanced, iMSDE inversion recovery TSE. A four-point Likert scale was used to evaluate overall image quality, nerve visualization, muscle/fat/vein suppression, and diagnostic confidence. The SNR contrast-to-noise ratio for nerve-to-background, and contrast ratio for nerve-to-background were calculated. The nerve cross-sectional area was evaluated between MR and ultrasound.
Results:
The iMSDE inversion recovery TSE yielded the highest subjective muscle suppression scores and greatest nerve-to-muscle contrast ratio (p < 0.001) among sequences. Compared with non-contrast sequence, iMSDE inversion recovery TSE provided superior nerve visualization, venous suppression, diagnostic confidence, and nerve-to-vein contrast-to-noise (all p < 0.001). Relative to contrast-enhanced sequence, iMSDE inversion recovery TSE demonstrated equivalent nerve visualization, venous suppression, and diagnostic confidence (p > 0.05). The iMSDE inversion recovery TSE showed excellent agreement with ultrasound cross-sectional area measurements. The cross-sectional area values correlated moderately with compound muscle action potential amplitudes (r = -0.679, p = 0.02).
Conclusions:
The iMSDE inversion recovery TSE can clearly visualize the morphology and pathologic changes of ulnar nerve, providing a feasible alternative method to detect ulnar neuropathy.
More Related Videos
06:40Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
11:06Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019