Context induces distortions in value representations across multiple elicitation methods and learning modalities.
Magdalena Soukupova1,2, Basile Garcia3, Stefano Palminteri4,5
1Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France. mag.soukupova@gmail.com.
Nature Communications
|May 7, 2026
Summary
Option values are remembered with bias, influenced by how they were learned. This context-dependent memory affects decision-making, even when values are recalled directly, not just chosen.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
- Neuroeconomics
Background:
- Value-based learning and decision-making are influenced by how options are presented.
- Previous research focused on choice-based value inference, leaving declarative value assessment less understood.
- The impact of learning architecture on subjective value perception requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether declarative value assessments exhibit similar biases as choice-based inferences.
- To determine if context-specific ranking during learning affects remembered option values.
- To explore how learning environments can be designed to enhance value maximization.
Main Methods:
- Conducted seven experiments involving participants learning and recalling option values.
- Employed various value elicitation methods, including choice-based and declarative recall.
- Utilized different decision modalities (experience-based and description-based) and learning configurations.
Main Results:
- Participants consistently remembered option values in a systematically biased manner.
- This bias was directly linked to the option's context-specific ranking during the learning phase.
- Results remained robust across different elicitation methods and decision modalities.
Conclusions:
- Subjective option values are susceptible to context-dependent memory distortions, even in declarative recall.
- The configuration of options during learning significantly impacts their subsequent subjective value.
- Principles of context dependence can be leveraged to design learning environments for improved decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
Altercasting is a strategic communication technique in which an individual imposes a specific identity or social role onto another person to influence their behavior and shape the interaction. By presuming a role—such as “responsible leader” or “patient person”—altercasting encourages the target to conform to that identity, often aligning their behavior with the expectations associated with the role. The power of this tactic lies in its subtlety; once a role is assigned, it becomes socially...
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
The Representativeness Heuristic
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

