Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional palpation for improving the success rate of
Baoying Feng1,2, Xiayu Zou1,2, Jieqiang Du1,2
1The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Background:
Ultrasound guidance enhances arterial catheterization by enabling real-time visualization. Various ultrasound-assisted techniques have been described. This study evaluated the clinical utility of ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) for radial artery catheterization compared with traditional palpation.
Methods:
Our study included 160 patients scheduled for elective surgery at Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2024 to March 2025. They were randomly assigned to either the traditional palpation group (n = 80) or the DNTP group (n = 80) via a web-based randomization tool. In accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, all 160 randomized patients were included in the primary analysis. Outcomes included first-attempt success, overall success, procedure time, catheter use, and complications. Subgroup analyses were based on arterial depth and cross-sectional area.
Results:
The DNTP group achieved significantly higher first-attempt and overall success rates than the palpation group (80/80, 100.00% vs 65/80, 81.25% and 80/80, 100.00% vs 66/80, 82.50%; all p < 0.001). Median procedure time was shorter with DNTP (27.5 s (12-98)) compared with palpation (35 s (20-173); p = 0.039). Successful cannulation within 3 min using a single attempt occurred in 100.00% (80/80) of DNTP cases versus 81.25% (65/80) in the palpation group (p < 0.001). Single-catheter use was more frequent in the DNTP group (80/80, 100.00%) than in the palpation group (73/80, 91.25%; p = 0.007). Complication rates were significantly lower with DNTP (13/80, 16.25%) compared with palpation (40/80, 50.00%; p < 0.001). Stratified analyses showed greater benefits of DNTP in patients with deeper arteries (>2 mm) and smaller cross-sectional areas (⩽3 mm2), with significant treatment-subgroup interactions for arterial depth (p = 0.021) and cross-sectional area (p = 0.008).
Conclusions:
Ultrasound-guided DNTP significantly improves the success rate, efficiency, and safety of radial artery catheterization, particularly in patients with unfavorable arterial anatomy.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation