Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials01:24

Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials

Brittle materials, including glass, cast iron, and stone, exhibit unique characteristics. They fracture without considerable change in their elongation rate, indicating that their breaking and ultimate strength are equivalent. Such materials also show lower strain levels at the point of rupture. The failure in brittle materials predominantly results from normal stresses, as evidenced by the rupture created along a surface perpendicular to the applied load. These materials do not display...
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress01:25

Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress

In designing structural elements and machine parts using ductile materials, it is crucial to ensure that these components withstand applied stresses without yielding. Yielding is initially determined through a tensile test, which evaluates the material's response to uniaxial stress. However, tensile stress is insufficient when components face biaxial or plane stress conditions This condition requires advanced criteria to predict failure.
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as the...
Fatigue01:21

Fatigue

Fatigue occurs when materials rupture under repeated or fluctuating loads, even at stress levels far below their static breaking strength. It typically results in brittle failure, even for ductile materials. It is a critical consideration in designing machines and structural components subjected to repetitive or varying loads. The nature of these loadings can range from fluctuating loads like unbalanced pump impellers causing vibrations to repeatedly bending a thin steel rod wire back and forth...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects01:26

Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects

Schottky defects arise when some lattice points in a crystal, such as those in NaCl, remain unoccupied, creating lattice vacancies without disturbing the overall electrical neutrality of the crystal. This defect is common in ionic crystals where the positive and negative ions are similar in size, as seen in sodium chloride and cesium chloride. The presence of Schottky defects enables the crystal to conduct electricity to a small extent through an ionic mechanism. Electric fields cause nearby...
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Ā Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Non-Stoichiometric Defects01:29

Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Non-Stoichiometric Defects

Non-stoichiometric defects refer to a type of defect in the crystal structure of a compound where the ratio of its constituent elements deviates from the ideal stoichiometric ratio. There are two main types of non-stoichiometric defects: metal excess defects and metal deficiency defects.Metal excess defects occur when there is a slight surplus of metal ions than what is required by the stoichiometric ratio of the compound. For example, heating a sodium chloride crystal in sodium vapor results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fragility of Assumptions: Letter to the Editor.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicineĀ·2026
Same author

Moving Beyond Sorry: The Acknowledge-Repair-Prevent (ARP) Framework for Colleague Apologies in Medicine.

CureusĀ·2026
Same author

Significance, Fragility, and Robustness in Clinical Trials: Stratifying Statistical Evidence.

CureusĀ·2026
Same author

Large Language Models Perform at Chance Level in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Pneumonia Using Chest Radiographs.

CureusĀ·2025
Same author

Adjusting fragility metrics for unequal trial randomizations.

Autoimmunity reviewsĀ·2025
Same author

Large Language Models Demonstrate Distinct Personality Profiles.

CureusĀ·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
06:58

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

Nonattainability of the Fragility Index.

Thomas F Heston1,2

  • 1Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, USA.

Cureus
|May 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary

The fragility index (FI), a measure of statistical significance robustness, is not always attainable for significant trial results. This limitation stems from the FI algorithm

Keywords:
clinical trial methodologycontingency tablesdomain incompletenessfisher's exact testfragility indexpartial function

More Related Videos

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
05:53

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
06:58

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
05:53

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Significance

Background:

  • The fragility index (FI) quantifies the number of outcome changes needed to nullify a statistically significant trial result.
  • A reliable metric should be universally applicable to all valid cases.
  • This study investigates the universal attainability of the fragility index.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if a fragility value can always be calculated for statistically significant two-arm trial results.
  • To identify conditions under which the fragility index is not attainable.
  • To assess the structural limitations of the fragility index algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed FI with baseline significance (p < 0.05) and restricted outcome changes.
  • Assessed nonattainability by searching for valid 2x2 tables where no finite FI can be obtained.
  • Utilized formal counterexamples, complete enumeration of 2x2 tables (N=60), and empirical evaluation of published trials.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that valid statistically significant 2x2 tables exist for which FI is unattainable.
  • A counterexample involves a table with no available nonevents for the required outcome toggle.
  • Unattainable cases were found starting at N=18, affecting 11.5% of tables by N=60 and 2.4% of published trials.

Conclusions:

  • The fragility index is not universally attainable.
  • This unattainability is an inherent structural property of the FI algorithm.
  • Mathematical proof, table enumeration, and published data confirm this limitation.