Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

04:08
Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Published on: April 5, 2024
Longitudinal Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Release: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Kosuke Saito1, Mitsuhiro Okada1, Shunpei Hama2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
The Journal of Hand Surgery
|May 8, 2026
Summary
Patient-reported outcomes for carpal tunnel release (CTR) show meaningful improvement 6-9 months post-surgery, plateauing around 12-14 months. Nerve conduction studies show a delayed recovery plateau compared to clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Hand Surgery
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent condition often treated with carpal tunnel release (CTR).
- The postoperative recovery timeline following CTR is not well-defined, impacting patient expectations and clinical management.
- Understanding the timing of meaningful improvement and recovery plateau is crucial for effective patient counseling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the time to achieve clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) after CTR for CTS.
- To identify the timing for reaching a plateau in PROMs following CTR.
- To compare the recovery trends observed in PROMs with those from nerve conduction studies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 82 patients undergoing CTR for CTS.
- Collection of PROMs (QuickDASH, BCTQ) at baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-surgery.
- Nerve conduction studies performed at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months to assess electrophysiological recovery.
Main Results:
- PROMs demonstrated improvement exceeding minimum clinically important differences between 6-9 months after CTR.
- Patient-reported outcomes reached a plateau approximately 12-14 months post-surgery.
- Nerve conduction studies showed a delayed plateau in distal latency for sensory and compound muscle action potentials around 18 months.
Conclusions:
- Clinical recovery, as measured by PROMs, is evident by 6-9 months and plateaus by 12-14 months after CTR.
- Electrophysiological recovery, assessed by nerve conduction studies, lags behind clinical improvement, plateauing later at approximately 18 months.
- Postoperative electrodiagnostic testing may not be beneficial due to the delayed electrophysiological recovery compared to clinical outcomes, aiding in patient counseling.
