Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Categorizing adult protective services programs by investigation and quality assurance practices
Gila R Shusterman1, Karl G Urban1, Juan J Nunez1,2
1WRMA, Inc, a TriMetrix Company, Rockville, MD, USA.
State adult protective services (APS) programs vary widely. Analysis reveals distinct clusters based on investigation and quality assurance (QA) practices, highlighting areas for improvement and standardization.
Area of Science:
- Social Gerontology
- Public Health Policy
- Human Services Administration
Background:
- State adult protective services (APS) programs exhibit significant variation in policies and practices due to diverse influences like funding, state culture, and community needs.
- The absence of a dedicated federal funding stream and standardized evidence-based practices has historically contributed to this heterogeneity.
- Recent federal regulations aim to increase standardization across APS programs nationwide.
Purpose of the Study:
- To categorize state APS programs based on their implementation levels of investigation and quality assurance (QA) policies and practices.
- To identify factors contributing to program quality and consistency by comparing identified clusters with state characteristics, administrative structures, and outcomes.
- To inform strategies for improving APS program quality and standardization in light of new federal requirements and funding.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from a national evaluation of APS programs.
- Employed principal component analysis to identify underlying dimensions of APS policies and practices.
- Applied cluster analysis to group APS programs based on implementation levels of investigation and QA.
Main Results:
- Identified distinct clusters of APS programs based on their adoption of investigation and quality assurance (QA) practices.
- Found significant differences among clusters concerning state characteristics, administrative structures, and system-level outcomes.
- Indicated that programs with higher implementation of investigatory and QA practices tend to be associated with better system-level outcomes.
Conclusions:
- APS programs can be meaningfully categorized by their level of investigation and QA practice implementation.
- State characteristics and administrative structures influence the variation in APS program practices.
- Findings suggest that adopting additional investigatory and QA practices presents opportunities for APS programs to enhance quality and consistency, aligning with federal mandates.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources, and lay...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks