Evaluation of an Integrated Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography Reconstruction Protocol for Carotid Artery Stents
Masahiro Nakashima1, Tatsuya Kawai2, Kazuhisa Matsumoto2
1From the Department of Radiology (M.N., K.M., A.H.), Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan; Nagoya City University Midori Municipal Hospital (T. Kawai, T. Kawaguchi), Japan and Nagoya City University Hospital (N.K., S.W.), Japan. masahiro.nakashima.0607@gmail.com.
Background And Purpose:
To evaluate an integrated protocol and to improve image quality for follow-up after carotid artery stenting (CAS) using photon-counting CT (PCD-CT) angiography.
Materials And Methods:
Patients who underwent CT angiography (CTA) after CAS using PCD-CT in 2023-2025 were included. We predefined an integrated reconstruction protocol that combines multiple reconstruction parameters into a clinically applicable configuration under practical feasibility constraints, and that can be consistently applied to all cases. Reconstruction parameters were as follows: slice thickness, 0.4mm; field-of-view, 120mm; kernel, Qr56; iterative reconstruction, QIR3; virtual monoenergetic image, 55keV, metal artifact reduction algorithm, off. We quantitatively measured in-stent luminal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), stent edge rise slope (ERS), and in-stent luminal artifact index inside stents (AI). We qualitatively assessed in-stent luminal image quality (IQ), stent edge sharpness, and in-stent luminal noise. We compared integrated protocol to our institution conventional protocol. Linear mixed-effects models were used for statistical analyses.
Results:
31 patients (median 77 years [71-79], 31 men) were included. Using conventional protocol as the reference, integrated protocol showed β = 34.5 (95%CI, 30.0 to 39.0; P < 0.001) in CNR, β = 1727 (95%CI, 1697 to 1759; P < 0.001) in ERS, β = -39.6 (95%CI, -44.9 to -34.4; P < 0.001) in AI, β = 2.15 (95%CI, 2.04 to 2.27; P < 0.001) in OIQ, β = 1.75 (95%CI, 1.65 to 1.85; P < 0.001) in sharpness, β = 1.15 (95%CI, 1.04 to 1.27; P < 0.001) in noise.
Conclusion:
Integrated protocol for CAS using PCD-CT yielded superior qualitative and quantitative performance compared with the conventional protocol.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

