Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
[Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for secondary sepsis in pneumonia]
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University (Jinan City People's Hospital), Jinan 271199, China.
Abstract:
This bidirectional cohort study included 452 patients with pneumonia (modeling cohort) from the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine at Jinan People's Hospital retrospectively enrolled between January 2021 and December 2023, and 300 patients with newly diagnosed pneumonia (validation cohort) prospectively recruited from January to December 2024. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (10-fold cross-validation, λ=0.023) was initially applied for dimensionality reduction. Subsequently, Firth-penalized logistic regression was used to construct the predictive model, followed by the development of a P-Sep scoring system. The system was validated using the bootstrap method (500 resamples) and an independent prospective cohort. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of interest: invasive mechanical ventilation (OR=5.12, 95%CI 3.05-8.61); positive blood culture (OR=4.23, 95%CI 2.38-7.51); lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L (OR=3.15, 95%CI 1.92-5.18); and serum amyloid A ≥100 mg/L (OR=2.58, 95%CI 1.52-4.39). The investigators established that the P-Sep score (0-12 points) was an independent predictor denoting low risk (0-5 points), intermediate risk (6-8 points), and high risk (≥9 points). In the modeling cohort, the area under the curve was 0.87 (95%CI 0.83-0.91; sensitivity: 85.2%; specificity: 89.3%). In the validation cohort, the area under the curve was 0.86 (95%CI 0.82-0.89; sensitivity: 84.8%; specificity: 89.1%). In addition, based on data from both cohorts, the predictive performance of the P-Sep score was compared with that of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and CURB-65. The results demonstrated that the P-Sep score exhibited favorable predictive efficacy in the warning of secondary sepsis in patients with pneumonia.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed.
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include: