Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

In Ovo Feeding of Commercial Broiler Eggs: An Accurate and Reproducible Method to Affect Muscle Development and Growth
Published on: September 20, 2021
Optimal replacement value of betaine for dietary methionine in broilers from 22 to 42 days of age
Heng Wang1,2, Lin Liu1,3,4, Xi He2
1Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Center of Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, 511400, China.
Abstract:
Betaine acts as a methyl donor and has been proposed as a potential substitute for methionine (Met) to reduce feed costs. This study aimed to investigate the optimal replacement value of betaine for dietary Met in broilers aged 22 to 42 days. A total of 1,440 male broilers were randomly divided into 6 treatments (6 replicates/pen). The positive control (PC) received a standard diet (0.53% Met), while the negative control (NC) received a low-Met diet (0.33% Met) with 2000 mg/kg betaine. Four additional groups received the NC diet supplemented with 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15%, or 0.20% Met. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and three regression models. Results indicated that Met deficiency significantly impaired growth performance: final body weight (BW) decreased from 1696 g (PC) to 1604 g (NC) (P < 0.001), while the feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) increased from 1.87 to 2.01. No significant differences were observed in slaughter performance (P > 0.05). Regarding metabolism, the NC group exhibited significantly elevated serum homocysteine (19.42 vs. 7.94 μmol/L) and hepatic ALT activity (11.77 vs. 4.35 U/g prot), alongside reduced hepatic BHMT activity (17.47 vs. 103.14 ng/mg prot, P < 0.001). Furthermore, Met deficiency downregulated the mRNA expression of genes related to one-carbon metabolism and intestinal tight junctions (relative expression ∼0.20 vs. 1.00 in PC, P < 0.05). Supplementation with 0.10% Met restored these parameters to levels statistically equivalent to the PC group. One-slope straight broken line and two-slope straight broken line regression analysis of the F/G ratio (R2 = 0.8598) determined the optimal replacement dose to be 0.1474% Met, corresponding to a 27.81% substitution efficiency.

