Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Scaled-Up Preparation of an Intermediate of Upatinib, ACT051-3
Published on: April 7, 2023
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, and Upadacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis: A
Antonio Tursi1,2, Andrea Pasta3, Walter Elisei4
1Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, Andria, Italy.
Introduction:
Tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib are Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) available for ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory or intolerant to at least one advanced therapy; their comparative effectiveness in clinical practice remains uncertain.
Methods:
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including adult UC patients initiating tofacitinib, filgotinib, or upadacitinib (September 2020-June 2025). Clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤ 1), steroid-free clinical remission, biochemical remission, and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score = 0) were assessed at predefined time-points. Baseline differences were controlled using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and time-to-event and longitudinal analyses were performed.
Results:
After IPTW, the pseudo-population included 627 patients (tofacitinib = 179, filgotinib = 138, upadacitinib = 310). In the weighted cohort, clinical remission probabilities at weeks 8, 24, and 52 were 17.5%, 40.7%, and 61.3% with upadacitinib, 11.8%, 33.8%, and 54.6% with tofacitinib, and 6.7%, 29.0%, and 52.0% with filgotinib, respectively; p < 0.001 at weeks 8 and 24; p = 0.040 at week 52. Steroid-free clinical remission showed a similar gradient (14.2%, 39.2%, and 59.8% with upadacitinib; 9.2%, 31.2%, and 50.8% with tofacitinib; 4.4%, 27.6%, and 49.8% with filgotinib, respectively; all p < 0.001. Biochemical remission was also achieved more frequently with upadacitinib at weeks 8 and 16, although differences between treatments were no longer significant during maintenance. At week 52, endoscopic remission was 18.8% with tofacitinib, 36.6% with upadacitinib, and 19.5% with filgotinib (p = 0.039). Overall adverse events, particularly infections and herpes zoster, were more frequent with tofacitinib, whereas filgotinib had fewer non-serious events; serious adverse events and colectomy risk were uncommon and similar across groups.
Conclusions:
All three JAKis were effective, but upadacitinib yielded the highest remission rates, while tofacitinib and filgotinib differed mainly in safety, supporting individualized drug positioning according to efficacy needs and patient-specific risks.
Insights
Upadacitinib demonstrated superior clinical remission rates compared to tofacitinib and filgotinib in ulcerative colitis patients. While all Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) were effective, differences in safety profiles suggest personalized treatment approaches for ulcerative colitis.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) like tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib are options for ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to advanced therapies.
- Comparative effectiveness of these JAKis in real-world clinical practice for UC is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib in adult patients with ulcerative colitis.
- To evaluate clinical remission, steroid-free remission, biochemical remission, and endoscopic remission rates at various time points.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective study of adult UC patients initiating one of the three JAKis.
- Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) used to control for baseline differences.
- Time-to-event and longitudinal analyses performed to assess outcomes.
Main Results:
- Upadacitinib showed higher probabilities of clinical remission at weeks 8, 24, and 52 compared to tofacitinib and filgotinib (p<0.001 at weeks 8 and 24).
- Steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic remission rates also favored upadacitinib at week 52 (p=0.039).
- Tofacitinib had more adverse events, particularly infections, while filgotinib had fewer non-serious events; serious adverse events were similar across groups.
Conclusions:
- All three JAKis are effective for ulcerative colitis, with upadacitinib demonstrating superior remission rates.
- Tofacitinib and filgotinib showed differences primarily in their safety profiles.
- Individualized drug selection is recommended based on patient efficacy needs and specific risks.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Ulcerative Colitis
