Evaluating regulatory oversight through major in vitro diagnostic recalls: a retrospective study of FDA data

Simran Simran1, Akash Thakur2, Akash Kacharu Ahire2

  • 1Department of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, India.

Abstract

Insights

Class I In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) recalls are a concern. Improving manufacturing and regulatory oversight, including AI-based surveillance, is key to enhancing patient safety and public health outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Device Regulation
  • In Vitro Diagnostics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • In vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices are crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and management.
  • Diagnostic errors can lead to delayed or incorrect treatments, negatively impacting public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze trends in Class I IVD recalls from the FDA database (2015-2024).
  • To identify common reasons for recalls, affected IVD classes, and the impact of premarket notification (510(k)) exemption status.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic analysis of the U.S. FDA recall database from 2015 to 2024.
  • Focus on Class I IVD recalls, excluding Class II and III recalls.
  • Evaluation of recall reasons, manufacturers, and 510(k) exemption status.

Main Results:

  • A total of 100 Class I IVD recalls were reported between 2015 and 2024.
  • Recalls primarily affected Approval-Class I (31) and Class II (69) IVDs.
  • Deficiencies in process control were a major cause, particularly in Approval-Class I IVDs (12 of 31).
  • A significant portion (23 of 31) of Approval-Class I IVDs were 510(k)-exempt.

Conclusions:

  • Enhancing process control, device design, and manufacturing is vital to minimize Class I IVD recalls.
  • Strengthening regulatory approaches with harmonized quality standards and AI-driven post-market surveillance can improve early detection of safety issues.
  • These improvements are essential for safeguarding patient safety and advancing public health.

Related Concept Videos

Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact01:03

Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

Drug control governance involves the oversight and regulation of pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy while preventing illegal drug use and trafficking. Regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMA), play a central role in this process. These agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs before they can be marketed. They fund clinical trials and assess the benefits and risks associated with a...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...