Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

In Ovo Feeding of Commercial Broiler Eggs: An Accurate and Reproducible Method to Affect Muscle Development and Growth
Published on: September 20, 2021
The effect of housing system and broiler breed on meat quality1
Jean C Caceres1, Camila Hammel Sobreira1, Afsana Rahaman Munmun2
1Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.
Abstract:
This study investigated the effects of the silvopastoral (SP) rearing system compared with a conventional (CV) indoor system, along with the influence of broiler breed (fast-growing, FAST vs. slow-growing, SLOW), on carcass traits (yields), meat quality, myopathy incidence, fatty acid profile, oxidative stability (TBARS), and sensory attributes. A 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted, using 250 birds per treatment, with 5 replicate pens (50 birds/pen). For data collection, 10 birds were selected from each pen for processing, giving a total of 5 replicates and 50 samples per treatment. FAST consistently exhibited superior carcass and breast yields, while SLOW had minimal breast muscle myopathies, regardless of the system. Several physicochemical traits were primarily influenced by the breed, with SLOW's breast exhibiting a greater content of connective tissue and shear force. In comparison, FAST exhibited greater moisture content. The housing system influenced lipid composition and oxidative stability, with SP meat exhibiting lower saturated fatty acid content than CV (40.16% vs. 42.04%) and reduced TBARS values (1.50 vs. 1.59 mg MDA/kg). However, the effect of SP on FAST was limited, as cooking loss did not differ between SP and CV systems (30.91% vs. 32.76%). Sensory results showed minimal differences; meat from CV birds was rated slightly juicier, while SLOW's meat was described as chewier and gummier. Overall, trade-offs were identified between yield performance and meat quality; meat from fast-growing birds had greater production efficiency but exhibited a greater incidence of muscular abnormalities. SP production demonstrated the potential to enhance certain meat quality traits without compromising sensory acceptance, albeit at a lower yield expense.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...

