Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Collection of Alfalfa Root Exudates to Study the Impact of Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate on Metabolite Production
Published on: June 2, 2023
Association of exposure to phthalates and substitutes with infection risk among U.S. children
Yu Zhang1, Siqi Jin1, Zichuan Li2
1MEEKL-AERM, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, and Center for Environment and Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Early exposure to di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP) increases infection risk in young children and adolescents. DiNP may not be a safe substitute for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) concerning immune health.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Toxicology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Early-life exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is linked to immune system issues in children.
- Data on the immune effects of DEHP substitutes like di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP), di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DiNCH), and di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP) is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and overall infection risk in U.S. children.
- To assess the potential risks of DEHP substitutes compared to legacy phthalates.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed urinary concentrations of 18 phthalate metabolites in 1,989 U.S. children aged 3-19 years.
- Utilized logistic and mixture models to examine associations between phthalate exposure and infection risk across three age groups.
- Included analysis of legacy phthalates and newer substitutes like DiNP, DiNCH, and DEHTP.
Main Results:
- Higher infection risk was associated with DiNP metabolites (MONP, MCOP) in young children (3-5 years) and adolescents (12-19 years).
- Adolescents exposed to other phthalate metabolites (e.g., mono-benzyl phthalate, mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate) showed increased infection odds.
- A mixture of phthalates was linked to higher infection risk in adolescents. DiNCH showed an isolated adverse association in 6-11-year-old boys.
Conclusions:
- Specific phthalates and phthalate mixtures may heighten children's susceptibility to infections.
- DiNP does not appear to be a safe alternative to DEHP for immune-related outcomes.
- Further research, including longitudinal and toxicological studies, is needed for newer substitutes like DiNCH and DEHTP.
Abstract:
Early-life exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) has been associated with compromised immune outcomes in childhood, while evidence regarding DEHP substitutes, such as di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP), di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DiNCH) and di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP), remains limited. This study analyzed urinary concentrations of 18 phthalate metabolites, including legacy phthalates and the newer substitutes, and examined their associations with overall infection risk among 1989 U.S. children representative of the US population stratified into three vulnerable age groups (3-5, 6-11, and 12-19 years). We applied logistic and mixture models to examine the associations. We found a higher infection risk associated with DiNP metabolite concentrations (MONP: mono-oxo-isononyl phthalate and MCOP: mono-carboxy-isooctyl phthalate) in children aged 3-5 years (3rd vs 1st tertile, MONP OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.34) and adolescents aged 12-19 years (MONP OR: 5.49, 95% CI: 2.30, 13.06; MCOP OR: 4.91, 95% CI: 2.11, 11.40). Adolescent urinary concentrations of other phthalate metabolites were associated with higher infection odds, including mono-benzyl phthalate (3rd vs 1st tertile OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.56, 7.37), mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (OR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.47, 5.99), mono-isobutyl phthalate (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.87), mono-hydroxy-isobutyl phthalate (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.48), and mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.97, 5.16). Among adolescents, each tertile increase in mixture concentration was associated with a higher infection risk (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.26, 4.77). Regarding non-phthalate alternatives, only an isolated deleterious association was found for DiNCH in boys but not girls aged 6-11 years. Although these associations should be validated in longitudinal cohorts, our results suggest that children's exposure to specific phthalates and phthalate mixtures may increase susceptibility to infections, and that DiNP does not appear to be a safe substitute for DEHP regarding immune-related outcomes. More observational and toxicological studies are needed, particularly for newer non-phthalate substitutes such as DiNCH and DEHTP.
More Related Videos
07:08Long-term Behavioral and Reproductive Consequences of Embryonic Exposure to Low-dose Toxicants
Published on: March 6, 2018
08:28Assessment of the Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds on the Development of Vertebrate Neural Network Function Using Multi-electrode Arrays
Published on: April 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Sexually Transmitted Infections