Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation using the AIFV system: a prospective
Yingrong Xin1, Jingchao Li2, Huihui Song2
1Department of Cardiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Background:
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Nevertheless, the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation remains limited by a substantial rate of recurrence. The selection of anesthesia, the surgeon's operative experience and medical expertise, as well as the ablation surgery strategy, all have an impact on the recurrence after atrial fibrillation surgery. Our research aims to explore a novel method for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.
Methods:
This study enrolled 148 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing first-time radiofrequency ablation. Based on the data from the AIFV system (an artificial intelligence-based ablation quality analysis system that generates structured Vistag scores from CARTO3 mapping data), patients were divided into two groups: the high-score group(Vistag analysis scores ≥ V5) and the low-score group(scores < V5). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and AIFV system-related data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.
Results:
Among the 148 enrolled patients, 84 were categorized into the high-score group and 64 into the low-score group. Patients in the low-score group had significantly higher Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), and Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV), as well as a higher prevalence of diabetes (29.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.002). During a minimum follow-up of 365 days, 11 patients (13.1%) in the high-score group experienced recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, compared to 19 patients (29.7%) in the low-score group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher atrial arrhythmia-free survival rate in the high-score group (log-rank test, P = 0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that being in the high-score group was an independent protective factor against AF recurrence (OR = 0.383, 95% CI 0.160-0.912, P = 0.030).
Conclusions:
The AIFV system was used to evaluate six procedural parameters in each atrial fibrillation procedure, which could play a crucial role in predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022