Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
Schemas01:42

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Differential Roles of Minority Stressors in LGB Identity Disclosure.

Journal of homosexuality·2026
Same author

The directed nature of social stereotypes.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Threats and opportunities: Independent dimensions of goal relevance shape social cognition and behavior.

The American psychologist·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Invisibility Is Dynamic.

Elia Q Y Lam1, Rebecca Neel1

  • 1University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People feel interpersonal invisibility dynamically, not constantly. This feeling depends on the specific race, gender, and goals of the perceiver in relation to the person experiencing invisibility.

Keywords:
intersectionalityinvisibilitysocial cognitionstigma

More Related Videos

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Stigmatization Studies

Background:

  • Interpersonal invisibility is a significant form of stigmatization.
  • Previous research primarily examined between-person effects (who feels invisible) rather than within-person effects (when people feel invisible).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the situational factors that influence when individuals experience interpersonal invisibility.
  • To understand the dynamic nature of feeling invisible based on intersecting social identities and perceiver goals.

Main Methods:

  • Five studies with 3,575 participants were conducted.
  • Participants reported feelings of invisibility based on their race and gender, and the race, gender, and goals (self-protection, romantic pursuit) of others.
  • Exploration of invisibility across same- and other-race interactions was included.

Main Results:

  • Interpersonal invisibility is not a static state but a dynamic experience.
  • Feelings of invisibility vary significantly depending on the interplay of one's own social identities (race, gender) and the social identities and motivations of the perceiver.
  • Specific combinations of race, gender, and goals between individuals predict experiences of invisibility.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a nuanced understanding of when and why individuals experience interpersonal invisibility.
  • Findings highlight the context-dependent nature of stigmatization and social perception.
  • Results contribute to theories of invisibility and social psychology by emphasizing within-person variability.