Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Ambiguity in vocal expression perception: Evidence from voice morphing and its electrophysiological correlates
1Institute of Language Sciences and Key Laboratory of Language Science and Multilingual Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, PR China.
None:
Vocal attitudes (e.g., confidence, desire) convey rich acoustic cues that transmit speaker's intentions and beliefs, playing a pivotal role in natural speech communication. Neurocognitive research has largely centered on inferring attitudes from voices with unambiguous, clearly defined meanings ("typical voices"), while the neural mechanisms underlying ambiguous voices remain underexplored-particularly compared to vocal emotions, leaving a critical gap in understanding paralinguistic socio-cognitive processing. Here, we employed voice morphing to blend two typical attitudinal voices of opposing valences while recording participants' valence ratings and electroencephalographic (EEG) responses. Data analysis combined conventional ERP analysis using linear mixed-effects modeling on single-trial data with multivariate approaches (multivariate temporal response function [mTRF], multivariate pattern analysis [MVPA]). Behaviorally, ambiguous voices elicited longer reaction times and intermediate valence ratings. Neurally, ambiguous voices showed a P2 component (274-324 ms) resembling positive voices, an N400-like negativity (400-450 ms) resembling negative voices, and a robust Late Sustained Negativity (LSN; 700-1600 ms) distinct from typical voices. Controlling for acoustic parameters eliminated early effects (N1/P2/N4), confirming that these effects reflected acoustic processing, while the LSN persisted-indexing neural responses to attitudinal ambiguity. mTRF analysis validated stronger late-stage neural tracking of ambiguous voices after accounting for acoustics; MVPA revealed cross-temporal early-late functional coupling between acoustic encoding and pragmatic inference. Together, these findings demonstrate the brain treats ambiguous attitudinal prosody as a distinct category, engaging a specialized cascade: enhanced early acoustic discrimination, graded valence evaluation, refined semantic processing, and effortful pragmatic inference. This work extends multi-stage models from emotional to attitudinal prosody, challenging strictly serial accounts by highlighting interactive neural dynamics in ambiguity resolution.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Non-Verbal Cues
Nonconscious Mimicry
Perception of Sound Waves
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...

