Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

09:05
Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Child Behaviour Checklist in the ABCD Study
Kane Pavlovich1, Toby Constable1, Alex Fornito1
1School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Victoria, Australia.
Developmental Science
|May 11, 2026
Summary
The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) shows poor psychometric properties in the large Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Its subscales lack construct validity, suggesting caution for dimensional measurement of child psychopathology.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Psychometrics
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) is a primary measure in developmental research.
- It is the main psychopathology measure in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (N=11,861).
- Detailed psychometric assessment of the CBCL within the ABCD cohort is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To rigorously assess the psychometric properties of the CBCL within the ABCD study.
- To evaluate the fit of commonly used structural models for the CBCL in this large cohort.
- To determine the validity and precision of CBCL subscales for dimensional measurement.
Main Methods:
- Multi-method psychometric framework including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Bifactor CFA (B-CFA), Factor Mixture Modeling (FMM), Item Response Theory (IRT), and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM).
- Analysis of data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (N=11,861; ages 8-11).
- Evaluation of unidimensionality, bifactor structure fit, construct validity, measurement precision, and factor stability.
Main Results:
- The commonly used bifactor structure of the CBCL did not fit the ABCD data.
- A unidimensional model adequately described the CBCL scale.
- Seven of eight subscales exhibited insufficient construct validity.
- Poor measurement precision was observed below the mean of latent traits.
- Item-level analyses yielded unstable factors with weak discriminant validity.
Conclusions:
- The CBCL's psychometric properties in the ABCD study are suboptimal for dimensional measurement.
- The scale functions as unidimensional rather than fitting a bifactor structure.
- Findings caution against using the CBCL for dimensional assessment of developmental psychopathology in large-scale research.
- Need for measures specifically validated for dimensional psychopathology in population studies.
