Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

07:41
Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
Published on: October 23, 2020
Interpreting Services Bridge Language Gaps in Diabetic Retinopathy Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Robert Boyle1, Kaitlyn Abigail Sy1, Sara Krachmalnick1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|May 11, 2026
Summary
Spanish-speaking patients with interpreters (SSI) showed similar or better follow-up adherence for diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to English-speaking (ES) patients. Interpreting services effectively bridge language barriers, improving patient retention in DR care.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Health Equity
Background:
- Consistent follow-up is crucial for preventing vision loss in diabetic retinopathy (DR).
- Language barriers can lead to patient non-adherence and loss to follow-up (LTFU).
- The impact of language discordance on DR follow-up, even with interpreter services, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare follow-up adherence between Spanish-speaking patients with interpreters (SSI) and English-speaking (ES) patients receiving intravitreal injections for DR.
- To determine if language discordance impacts follow-up when interpreter services are provided.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of DR patients receiving anti-VEGF injections from 2012-2022.
- Patients categorized as SSI or ES based on preferred language; interpreter services offered to all SSI patients.
- Adherence defined as clinic visits within 1 month of recommended time; LTFU defined as no visits within 12 months of injection.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in adherence rates after initial visit or injections between SSI (78.9%-80.7%) and ES (82.8%-82.3%) groups.
- Similar overall LTFU rates (57.9% SSI vs 67.2% ES), but differing patterns of LTFU.
- SSI status was protective against LTFU (aHR 0.534; p=0.024), indicating better retention with interpreter services.
Conclusions:
- Interpreting services effectively mitigate the negative impact of language discordance on patient follow-up in DR care.
- Spanish-speaking patients with interpreters demonstrated comparable or superior follow-up adherence.
- The findings highlight the value of interpreter services in retina specialty care and suggest future prospective studies.
