Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Current Diagnostic Approaches and Challenges in the General Emergency Department Evaluation of Suspected Pediatric
Courtney W Mangus1,2,3, Sarah J Parker1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher4,5
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Insights
Physicians in general emergency departments face challenges diagnosing pediatric appendicitis due to limited ultrasound availability and reliance on experience over decision support tools. Improved guidelines and tools are needed to optimize care and reduce unnecessary CT scans.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Pediatric appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, leading to over a million annual emergency department visits.
- Ultrasound is recommended for initial diagnosis, but variability in availability and interpretation in general EDs can lead to overuse of CT scans.
- Clinical decision support (CDS) tools and shared decision making (SDM) may reduce unnecessary CTs, but their current use is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe current diagnostic approaches for pediatric appendicitis in general emergency departments.
- To identify challenges faced by physicians in these settings.
- To inform the development of universally applicable diagnostic guidelines and CDS tools.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 physicians in general emergency departments.
- Interviews assessed diagnostic approaches, challenges, use of CDS tools (e.g., pediatric appendicitis risk calculator - pARC), and SDM.
- Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic approach.
Main Results:
- Limited ultrasound availability often prevents its routine use.
- Physicians tend to rely on clinical gestalt rather than CDS tools.
- There is a need for guidelines on transferring patients to pediatric centers.
- The pARC tool could be enhanced with general ED-specific recommendations.
- SDM is frequently used, but its conceptualization and execution vary.
Conclusions:
- Physicians in general EDs face significant challenges in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis.
- A diagnostic pathway integrating validated CDS and general ED-specific recommendations could optimize care.
- Such a pathway may enhance SDM and potentially reduce unnecessary CT scans.
Abstract:
Background. Pediatric abdominal pain accounts for more than 1 million emergency department (ED) visits annually, and appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency. Guidelines recommend ultrasound as the initial imaging study for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. However, because of the variability in both the availability and interpretation of pediatric ultrasounds in general EDs, clinicians may potentially overuse computed tomography (CT). Shared decision making (SDM) and clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help avoid unnecessary CTs; however, it is not clear to what extent such tools are used. Our objective was to describe the current diagnostic approaches and challenges faced by physicians in general EDs when assessing potential pediatric appendicitis. Understanding the nuances specific to this context may help inform the creation of more universally applicable diagnostic guidelines and CDS tools. Methods. We conducted semi-structured interviews with physicians practicing in general EDs to assess the current approaches and challenges in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. We sought input on the use of existing CDS tools such as the pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) and the role of SDM. We analyzed interview transcripts using a thematic approach. Results. We conducted 15 interviews and identified 5 themes: 1) the limited availability of ultrasound often precludes routine use, 2) physicians tend to rely on gestalt over CDS tools, 3) guidelines regarding the transfer of patients to pediatric centers are needed, 4) the pARC could be improved with the integration of general ED-specific recommendations, and 5) physicians described using SDM frequently, but conceptualization and execution varied. Conclusion. Physicians in general EDs identified challenges in the current approaches to diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. A diagnostic pathway that incorporates validated CDS and general ED-specific recommendations could optimize the process, enhance SDM, and potentially reduce unnecessary CTs.
Highlights:
Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis is challenging, especially in general EDs where pediatric resources are often limited.Physicians in general EDs reported that current imaging techniques and clinical decision support tools often fail to meet the needs of their setting.Physicians often rely on their own experience and often incorporate family preferences (via shared decision making) into their diagnostic planning.Physicians in general EDs reported that better guidelines and community-specific diagnostic algorithms and clinical decision support tools would improve patient care.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.