Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
External Validation and Recalibration of a Risk Calculator for Major Bleeding After Diagnostic Kidney Biopsy
Jordan Thorne1,2, Victoria Lebedeva3, Aran Thanamayooran2
1Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rationale & Objective:
Bleeding is a serious complication of diagnostic kidney biopsy. A risk calculator for major bleeding associated with kidney biopsy exists, but its performance has not been tested externally.
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting & Participants:
We collected data from all adults who underwent diagnostic kidney biopsy from 2012 to 2019 at a quaternary care center in Halifax, NS to generate an external validation cohort for the "Risk of bleeding complications after kidney biopsy" prediction model (https://perioperativerisk.com/kbrc), which includes the predictors of age, weight, height, platelet count, hemoglobin, kidney size, and native versus transplant graft kidney.
Outcomes:
Major bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion, surgical intervention/embolization, or death.
Analytical Approach:
Predicted probabilities from patients in the validation cohort were used to assess the model, which was then re-examined using a larger combined cohort of patients from both model derivation and validation datasets.
Results:
External validation was performed using 715 patients in an external validation cohort from Halifax, NS. Major bleeding occurred in 48 of 1,732 patients in the combined cohort, with a total major bleeding risk of 2.7%. The model demonstrated good overall discrimination performance in the validation cohort (C-statistic, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85) and was well calibrated (calibration slope, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41-1.02). Recalibration improved performance in the combined cohort; model performance improved with the combined dataset (optimism-corrected C-statistic, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.88]; bias-corrected calibration slope, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.88]).
Limitations:
Although model extension was performed with a relatively large patient cohort, the precision of performance remained limited by the small number of major bleeding events.
Conclusions:
In this study, a risk calculator for predicting major bleeding complications from kidney biopsy demonstrated good model performance in an external validation that improved with recalibration in a combined cohort. This model can be used to individualize patient risk assessment for kidney biopsy-related major bleeding events, facilitating preprocedural optimization and more efficient allocation of postprocedural monitoring.
More Related Videos
03:13Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...