Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
The Forensic Tabula Rasa - Agreement on Manner of Death from Injury Patterns to the Extremities Only
Anton Mittendorf1,2,3, Josephine Gydell4, Yohan Robinson5
1Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. anton.mittendorf@rmv.se.
Purpose:
In Sweden, the forensic pathologist must determine the manner of death. Contextual information is often used in these assessments. This study investigates the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of forensic pathologists when determining the manner of death based solely on autopsy findings of sharp force injuries to extremities, excluding contextual data.
Methods:
23 forensic pathologists and forensic pathologists in training assessed injury data from 59 cases, visualized using body maps. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa. Sensitivity, specificity and the influence of experience and number of injuries were evaluated.
Results:
Agreement among raters was moderate at best. No experience level outperformed others significantly, though senior specialists had a higher specificity. Sensitivity was higher for suicides (0.656) than homicides (0.535), while specificity was high for both (>0.85). The number of injuries positively influenced agreement and sensitivity.
Conclusion:
Forensic pathologists showed only moderate agreement, with better consistency in suicide cases. Experience level had a significant impact of specificity but limited impact on sensitivity, where the number of injuries was a more significant factor. These findings suggest that while extremity injury patterns can be used to assess the manner of death, their interpretative value is conditional and influenced by contextual information.
