Treatment strategies for imipenemase-producing Gram-negative infections: lessons from Japan

Carbapenems remain essential for treating serious infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria because of their broad-spectrum activities and favourable safety profiles. However, the emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, which produce enzymes that efficiently hydrolyse β-lactams including carbapenems, continues to undermine their clinical utility. Although new antibiotics such as ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and cefiderocol have expanded therapeutic options, their effectiveness varies substantially across different carbapenemase families. Carbapenemases produced by Enterobacterales include serine β-lactamases (Ambler classes A and D) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs; Ambler class B), each with distinct substrate and inhibitor profiles. Clinically relevant MBLs-including imipenemase (IMP), New Delhi MBL (NDM), and Verona integron-encoded MBL (VIM) variants-show markedly different biochemical properties and inhibitor susceptibilities. Despite their clinical relevance, optimal treatment strategies for infections caused by IMP-producing Enterobacterales remain poorly defined. The unique reactivity of IMP-type MBLs to inhibitors differs from that of other MBLs such as NDMs or VIMs, underscoring the need for tailored therapeutic approaches. In this Personal View, we summarise current evidence and, drawing on Japan's experience as an endemic setting for IMP producers, outline key scientific, clinical, and public health challenges that should be addressed globally to develop effective, evidence-based treatment strategies for IMP-producing Enterobacterales infections.