Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Development and internal validation of an explainable machine-learning model to predict 3-year overall survival rate
Yunze Wang1, Aikeshanjiang Ailiyaer1, Shiming Chen1
1Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China.
Background:
This study aimed to develop and internally validate an explainable machine-learning model using routinely available clinicopathologic and laboratory variables for predicting 3-year overall survival (OS) after radical cystectomy.
Methods:
We retrospectively included 300 patients who underwent radical cystectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was prespecified as death within 3 years after surgery, chosen as a clinically relevant fixed-time milestone with relatively complete follow-up at this horizon in our cohort. Predictors were selected in the training set using LASSO logistic regression followed by random-forest recursive feature elimination.
Results:
In internal validation, AUCs ranged from 0.834 to 0.950. CatBoost achieved the best overall classification performance (AUC = 0.931, accuracy = 0.862, sensitivity = 0.647, specificity = 0.951, PPV = 0.846, and NPV = 0.867). SHAP analyses identified tumor stage (T, N, and M stage) as the dominant drivers of predicted risk, with additional contributions from age, BMI, albumin, globulin, lymphocyte count, platelet count, and preoperative creatinine.
Conclusions:
We developed an internally validated, SHAP-interpretable CatBoost model for predicting 3-year overall survival (OS) after radical cystectomy. External validation and recalibration in independent cohorts are required before clinical use.
Trial Registration:
This study did not involve a prospective clinical trial.
Trial Registration:
Not applicable.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
