Symptom networks of internalizing and externalizing problems in children with leukemia: a network analysis and

Zilong Ma1, Xinyan Guo1, Liwen Min1

  • 1School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, No. 100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China.

BMC Psychology
|May 12, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Internalizing and externalizing problems in children with leukemia form a connected system. Targeting symptoms like impulsivity and peer victimization may reduce overall symptom burden, guiding future interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Psychology
  • Network Analysis

Background:

  • Children with leukemia often exhibit internalizing and externalizing problems.
  • The interactions between these symptoms are not well understood.
  • Network analysis can explore symptom associations and identify intervention targets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the network structure of internalizing and externalizing problems in children with leukemia.
  • To identify central and bridge symptoms within this network.
  • To simulate the impact of symptom perturbations on the overall symptom burden.

Main Methods:

  • Used data from 1,126 children with leukemia in rehabilitation.
  • Assessed emotional and behavioral problems using the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
  • Estimated an Ising network model and identified central/bridge symptoms using expected influence metrics and simulation analyses (NIRA).

Main Results:

  • "Motor fidgeting," "peer victimization," and "low mood" were identified as highly central symptoms.
  • "Motor fidgeting" and "peer victimization" connected internalizing and externalizing problems.
  • Simulated alleviation of "impulsivity" reduced overall symptom burden by 19.71%; aggravation of "motor fidgeting" increased it by 22.76%.

Conclusions:

  • Internalizing and externalizing problems in pediatric leukemia patients form an interconnected system.
  • Findings suggest targeting impulse control, peer relationships, and emotion regulation may be key for interventions.
  • Results are hypothesis-generating and require further investigation for causal intervention effects.
Abstract