Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:20

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

The key difference between Superficial Vein Thrombosis (SVT) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) lies in their location and severity.Clinical ManifestationsSVT typically presents with localized pain, tenderness, and redness along the course of a superficial vein, often accompanied by a palpable, cord-like structure under the skin. This condition is usually less dangerous than DVT but can be uncomfortable and may lead to complications such as cellulitis or, rarely, a clot extension into the deep...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimal and Substantial Improvement Thresholds for Oxford Scores Following Primary Hip and Knee Replacement Based on Patient Satisfaction.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

What hip and spinopelvic characteristics are associated with ischiofemoral impingement?

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Femoral nerve palsy in brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip : incidence and outcomes in a prospective international cohort.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Dislocation is associated with increased mortality following revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fractures.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2026
Same author

Direct anterior approach for femoral osteotomy: a new surgical technique.

Journal of hip preservation surgery·2026
Same author

Editorial Comment: 15th Symposium on Joint Preserving and Minimally Invasive Surgery-A Consensus Meeting on Native Hip Instability.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Femoral Version Measurements Vary Significantly Between Commonly Used Methods: Implications for Defining Diagnostic

Camille Vorimore1, Kevin Smit1, Kawan Rakhra1

  • 1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine
|May 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Femoral version measurement techniques vary significantly, impacting diagnostic accuracy. This study highlights the need for method-specific normal ranges and suggests 3D imaging offers a more detailed assessment for femoral version abnormalities.

Keywords:
3D measurementsCTfemoral versionhip

More Related Videos

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
08:43

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination

Published on: July 7, 2016

Identifying Frailty Using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Image Acquisition and Assessment
04:00

Identifying Frailty Using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Image Acquisition and Assessment

Published on: July 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
08:43

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination

Published on: July 7, 2016

Identifying Frailty Using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Image Acquisition and Assessment
04:00

Identifying Frailty Using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Image Acquisition and Assessment

Published on: July 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Medical imaging analysis
  • Biomechanical assessment

Background:

  • Accurate femoral version measurement is crucial for diagnosing abnormalities and guiding surgical interventions.
  • Numerous measurement techniques exist, leading to potential discrepancies in clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare differences between four 2D and 3D femoral version measurement techniques.
  • To assess how femoral version influences measurement discrepancies.
  • To evaluate an automated method's accuracy for femoral version determination.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort study of 100 patients undergoing hip preservation surgery.
  • Pelvic CT scans were used to measure femoral version with two 2D (Murphy, Reikeras) and two 3D (Sugano, Lee) techniques.
  • Measurements were taken relative to the posterior condylar axis (PCA) and transepicondylar axis (TEA), with interobserver reliability assessed.

Main Results:

  • All 2D methods showed excellent interobserver reliability (ICC: 0.93-0.97).
  • Mean femoral version varied widely, from 3.4° (Lee) to 23.2° (Murphy).
  • Strong correlations (R² > 0.8) were found for converting values between methods, with excellent agreement between manual 2D and automatic 3D methods.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variations in femoral version measurements exist across different techniques.
  • Method-specific normal ranges are essential due to differing mean values and reproducibility.
  • 3D imaging provides a more detailed and practical assessment compared to 2D methods.