Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells for Gene Therapy Applications
Published on: August 9, 2022
Simple Interventions Can Improve Access to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries
Deepak Bansal1, Swati Chandel1, Rekha Hans2
1Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Background:
The aim was to enhance access to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for high-risk neuroblastoma in a public hospital in a lower-middle-income country, while ensuring safety.
Methods:
Data from a single center were analyzed in this ambispective, observational study spanning 12 years (2012-2023). The adaptations included performing ASCT in isolation rooms within the general ward, storing stem cells at 2°C-6°C without cryopreservation for 7 days, utilizing plerixafor for stem cell mobilization, no central lines, minimizing venipunctures for sampling, no antibacterial/antifungal/antiviral prophylaxis, administering pegylated-G-CSF on Day +4, avoiding platelet transfusion for asymptomatic thrombocytopenia, prednisolone for preventing engraftment syndrome, and early discharge upon rising white cell count and monocytosis.
Results:
Seventy-three patients were treated on the backbone of the high-risk neuroblastoma study-1 of SIOP-Europe (SIOPEN). The median age was 38 months. Sixty-six (90.4%) patients had Stage 4 disease. A regimen of busulfan+melphalan was administered to 62 (84.9%) patients. Median CD34 cell count and stem cell viability were 5.2 × 106/kg and 91.5%. The median hospital stay was 20 days. At discharge, the median absolute neutrophil and platelet counts were 0.60 × 109/L and 19 × 109/L. After 2017, there was a reduction in the number of aphereses (p < 0.001), blood transfusions (p = 0.003), amphotericin (p = 0.012), and venipunctures (p = 0.045). Forty (54.8%) patients died; relapse: 33 (82.5%); progressive disease: five (12.5%); and treatment-related mortality: two (5%). There was no case of engraftment failure. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 55.3 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 34.6% ± 6.6% and 27% ± 5.8%. Survival was comparable to our historical cohort of 28 patients treated without ASCT (4-year EFS: 29.3%; 4-year OS: 29.3%).
Conclusion:
In our cohort, the incorporation of ASCT into multimodality therapy was feasible with resource-adapted strategies; however, this did not translate into a meaningful improvement in survival outcomes when compared with our historical non-transplant cohort.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell types that...
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Stem Cell Culture
