Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Recalibration and external validation of vascular risk calculators for multiple sclerosis: A population-based study
Raffaele Palladino1, Ruth Ann Marrie2, Giuseppina Affinito3
1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College of London, London, UK; Department of Public Health, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Background:
People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have an elevated risk of macrovascular disease that may be underestimated by vascular risk calculators (VRCs) validated in the general population.
Objectives:
This study evaluated, recalibrated and externally validated five commonly used VRCs for PwMS using population-based data from England, 1987-2023.
Methods:
PwMS and matched controls were identified from Clinical Practice and Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD (calibration) and CPRD Aurum (validation). Exposure variables included multiple sclerosis (MS) status and risk factors as defined in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, Framingham Risk Score (FRS), FRS-BMI (body mass index), QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3 score and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation version 2 score (SCORE2). Model performance was assessed using Somers' D statistic, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square test. VRCs with ROC < 0.70 in PwMS were recalibrated using Cox regression, incorporating MS status. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to estimate Somers' D.
Results:
Calibration: 9411 PwMS and 57,805 controls; validation: 45,934 PwMS and 278,452 controls. Discrimination declined with standard thresholds (e.g. SCORE2 sensitivity in PwMS, 30.0%). Only FRS-BMI retained all significant predictors and was successfully recalibrated, improving discrimination (Somers' D = 0.815 vs. 0.792; Δ = 0.023) and showing good calibration. External validation showed modest gain (Somers' D = 0.716; Δ = 0.003).
Conclusion:
These findings underscore the limitations of general-population VRCs in PwMS and support the development of MS-specific vascular risk models.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

