Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

09:11
Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
Published on: January 27, 2023
Strategic AI-human collaboration for biology assessment design: a practical workflow
Parul Khurana1, Hitesh Rai Kathuria1
1Empire State University, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA.
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
|May 12, 2026
Summary
Biology instructors can now ensure AI-generated rubrics are scientifically accurate using a new five-phase workflow. This AI-human collaboration balances tool efficiency with expert oversight for reliable assessments.
Area of Science:
- Biology Education
- Educational Technology
- Artificial Intelligence in Education
Background:
- Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly adopted by biology instructors for creating assessment rubrics.
- A significant gap exists in systematic workflows to ensure the scientific accuracy of AI-generated rubric criteria.
- This necessitates a structured approach for effective AI integration in biology assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a validated five-phase workflow for strategic AI-human collaboration in developing scientifically accurate assessment rubrics for undergraduate biology courses.
- To outline a process that integrates AI efficiency with essential human expertise for robust evaluation criteria.
Main Methods:
- A five-phase workflow was developed and tested across diverse undergraduate biology assessments (lab reports, genetics problems, discussions).
- Phases included: human-led learning outcome definition, AI-assisted criteria generation, human validation with biology-specific refinements, collaborative testing with sample work, and human-led implementation.
- The workflow incorporates decision rules, validation strategies, and practical examples for maintaining scientific rigor.
Main Results:
- The workflow effectively balances AI-driven efficiency in initial rubric generation with crucial human expertise in scientific reasoning and discipline-specific evaluation.
- Field testing across various biology assessments demonstrated the workflow's utility in maintaining scientific accuracy.
- The process ensures AI-generated criteria are refined and validated by subject matter experts.
Conclusions:
- The presented five-phase workflow provides a systematic and effective method for biology instructors to leverage generative AI for assessment rubric creation while upholding scientific integrity.
- Strategic AI-human collaboration is key to maximizing AI's benefits in education without compromising assessment quality.
- This approach supports the accurate and efficient development of assessment tools in biology education.