Related Experiment Videos
Implementation Outcomes and Impact of a School Health and Wellness Network Specialist Intervention in Chicago Public
Jamie F Chriqui1, Julien Leider, Elizabeth Jarpe-Ratner
1Author Affiliations:Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Chriqui and Jarpe-Ratner, Ms Offstein); Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Chriqui and Mr Leider); Moffitt Cancer Center (Dr Lin); Chicago Public Schools Office of Student Health and Wellness (Mr Simon, Mr. Zolfo, Ms DeClemente); American Institute for Research (Ms Tully).
Objectives:
To evaluate implementation, impact, and cost-effectiveness of a Network Specialist intervention focused on health and wellness policy implementation in Chicago Public Schools. Education sector (Multi-Tiered System of Supports) and implementation science (Implementation Outcomes Framework, SISTER) frameworks informed the intervention.
Design:
Quasi-experimental case-comparison efficacy study conducted between 2020-2021 and 2022-2023. Annual survey data and key informant interviews were used to evaluate implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility); survey and administrative data were used to assess impact and cost effectiveness using difference-in-difference (DID) analyses and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Setting:
One elementary school Network located on Chicago's Westside (intervention) and 1 socio-demographically matched comparison Network (DID only).
Participants:
Network Specialists, school-level stakeholders, and school-level administrative data.
Intervention:
The Network Specialist provided a multi-tiered system of support to schools for health and wellness policy implementation.
Main Outcome Measure:
Healthy CPS score (out of 100) and ICER.
Results:
The Specialist served 20 schools/year and an average of 302 students/school. At least 85% of school stakeholders perceived high levels of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of working with the Specialist to support policy implementation. Schools in the intervention Network increased their Healthy CPS scores by 8 percentage points (70.95% pre vs. 78.95% post; P = .03), whereas scores stayed the same in the comparison network (74.03% pre vs. 73.03% post; P = .68), for an estimated 9-percentage point DID-estimated impact ( P = .04). The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that it cost each school $414, on average, to increase their Healthy CPS score by 1 percentage-point.
Conclusions:
Having a designated district-level Specialist to provide multi-tiered supports to schools to help with health and wellness policy implementation is cost-effective and is valued and appreciated by schools. The Specialist connects schools to key resources and services which enables them to improve their school-level implementation of federal, state and local health and wellness policy requirements.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...