Adaptive Dosing Trial Simulation Framework to Inform Dose Optimization: Case Study Using Longitudinal PKPD Models

Jerry Li1, Li Zhou1, Abraham C F Leung2

  • 1Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.

Insights

Developing an adaptive simulation framework helps optimize oncology drug dosing by accounting for real-time safety adjustments, improving benefit-risk assessment for novel therapeutics like PF-06804103.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics and Computational Pharmacology
  • Oncology Drug Development
  • Clinical Trial Simulation

Background:

  • Optimal dosing for oncology therapeutics requires integrating pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety.
  • Dose modifications due to toxicity are common for chronic treatments and impact outcomes.
  • Existing simulation models often use static dose modification schedules, failing to capture dynamic adverse event impacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a quantitative modeling approach for optimizing the dosing regimen of PF-06804103, an anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate.
  • To create an adaptive clinical trial simulation framework that incorporates adverse event-driven dose modifications.
  • To better understand the exposure-response relationships for PF-06804103, considering its narrow therapeutic window.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an adaptive clinical trial simulation framework.
  • Integrated pharmacokinetic, tumor dynamic, and longitudinal models for peripheral neuropathy.
  • Utilized a repeated time-to-event approach to model adverse events and dose modifications.

Main Results:

  • The framework successfully accounts for real-time impacts of safety on PK and efficacy.
  • Simulations enabled evaluation of different dosage regimens for PF-06804103.
  • The approach facilitates identification of optimal dosing strategies balancing benefit and risk.

Conclusions:

  • An adaptive simulation framework is crucial for optimizing oncology drug dosing, especially with narrow therapeutic windows.
  • This model-based approach accurately captures the dynamic interplay between PK, safety, and efficacy.
  • The framework can be adapted for other oncology therapeutics with complex exposure-related safety and efficacy profiles.

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components01:14

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) modeling is essential in drug development and clinical pharmacology. It provides a quantitative framework to predict drug behavior and response over time. This approach integrates pharmacokinetics (PK), which describes the drug's absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, with pharmacodynamics (PD), which characterizes the drug’s biological effects and mechanisms of action.The disposition kinetics of a drug determine its plasma...
Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...