Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a negative...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point-intercept approaches.

Applications in plant sciences·2021
Same author

On the Pitfalls of Estimating and Using Standardized Reliability Coefficients.

Educational and psychological measurement·2021
Same author

Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.

Educational and psychological measurement·2020
Same author

On True Score Evaluation Using Item Response Theory Modeling.

Educational and psychological measurement·2020
Same author

A Note on the Presence of Spurious Pseudo-Guessing Parameters for Three-Parameter Logistic Models in Heterogeneous Populations.

Educational and psychological measurement·2020
Same author

A Method for Examining the Equating of Psychometric Scales and Tests: An Application Using Dementia Screening Test Batteries.

Educational and psychological measurement·2020
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Are 7-point Likert scales preferable to 5-point scales in language research?

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level
07:28

Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level

Published on: January 24, 2025

An omnibus test for several dependent correlations.

Zvi Drezner1, George A Marcoulides2, Dawit Zerom3

  • 1California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA. zdrezner@fullerton.edu.

Behavior Research Methods
|May 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical test to determine if an outcome has equal correlations with multiple predictors. The dependence-robust omnibus test offers improved accuracy, avoiding false alarms and missed discoveries in data analysis.

Keywords:
Dependent correlationsOmnibus test

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level
07:28

Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level

Published on: January 24, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement

Background:

  • Assessing the relationship between multiple predictors and an outcome is common in research.
  • Existing methods for comparing correlations can be limited by assumptions and sensitivity to dependence structures.
  • There is a need for a robust method to evaluate the equality of correlations across multiple predictors simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel dependence-robust omnibus test for evaluating the equality of correlations between an outcome and multiple predictors.
  • To demonstrate the test's ability to account for shared sampling variation, enhancing accuracy.
  • To provide a practical tool for researchers to assess multiple outcome-predictor relationships.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new omnibus statistical test generalizing the two-correlation comparison.
  • Utilizing Monte Carlo simulations to assess the test's size and power under various conditions.
  • Accounting for shared sampling variation among correlations.
  • Illustrating the method with real-world educational data.

Main Results:

  • The omnibus test demonstrates near-nominal size (<5% at alpha=0.05) for sample sizes >= 50 across diverse dependence structures.
  • The test maintains accuracy under moderate non-normality (e.g., t5 errors).
  • High statistical power was observed for moderate departures from equality in correlations.
  • Pairwise tests are nested as a special case within the omnibus framework.

Conclusions:

  • The dependence-robust omnibus test is a practical and accurate default for assessing the equality of outcome-predictor correlations.
  • The test effectively controls Type I and Type II errors by accounting for shared sampling variation.
  • The accompanying interactive web app facilitates the adoption and application of this new statistical method.
  • Pairwise contrasts can supplement the omnibus test for nuanced interpretation but should not be the primary inference.