Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Published on: May 5, 2023
Accuracy of digital inclinometers for measuring knee extension during total knee arthroplasty: comparison with visual
Anuwat Pongkunakorn1, Chonlathan Iamsumang1, Sayun Sumethvanich1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lampang Hospital and Medical Education Center, Lampang, 52000, Thailand.
Background:
Accurate intra-operative assessment of knee extension angle is essential in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as residual flexion contracture or hyperextension is associated with inferior post-operative function and increased implant wear. Visual estimation remains widely used, but prior research has demonstrated substantial inaccuracy. This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of a digital inclinometer technique for measuring knee extension angle during TKA, using computer navigation as the reference standard.
Methods:
A prospective comparative study was performed on 130 knees undergoing primary posterior-stabilized TKA. After trial implant insertion, knee extension was assessed using two methods: visual estimation and a digital inclinometer method utilizing the femoral chisel holder and anterior border of the tibial crest. All measurements were compared with OrthoPilot navigation. Accuracy was defined as measurements within ± 2° of navigation. Correlation, agreement, and intra- and inter-observer reliability were evaluated.
Results:
Visual estimation underestimated extension and showed a mean difference of - 3.5° ± 4.1° versus navigation (p < 0.001). The proportion of knees within ± 2° of navigation was only 26.2%. In comparison, the digital inclinometer demonstrated a significantly smaller mean difference of 0.1° ± 1.6° (p = 0.753), with 86.9% of knees meeting the ± 2° accuracy threshold. Superiority of the inclinometer persisted across all subgroups of pre-operative deformity. Correlation with navigation was weak for visual estimation (r = 0.320; r2 = 0.102), but very strong for the inclinometer technique (r = 0.894; r2 = 0.799; both p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal bias and no proportional error for the inclinometer, whereas visual estimation showed wide limits of agreement. Intra- and inter-observer reliability for inclinometer measurements was excellent (ICCs of 0.91 and 0.93), superior to visual estimation.
Conclusion:
The digital inclinometer technique provides accurate and reproducible intra-operative knee extension measurements, outperforming visual estimation and approximating navigation-based assessment. This low-cost approach is feasible where navigation is unavailable.
Trial Registration:
Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20180828002). Registered on 28 August 2018. Prospectively registered.