Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
The Role of Motion Correction Tools in Left Ventricular Functional Parameters Measured by Gated [13N]NH3 PET/CT
Tonantzin Samara Martinez-Lucio1, Remco J J Knol2, Oscar I Mendoza-Ibañez1,2
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
None:
Background/Objectives: Gated cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) synchronizes PET data to the cardiac cycle based on an electrocardiogram (ECG) signal, providing left ventricular (LV) functional and geometrical parameters. Nevertheless, image artifacts, due to cardiac-, breathing-, and/or patient-motion occurring during image acquisition, undermine the reliability and clinical utility of these parameters. This study aims to elucidate the effect of two motion correction (MC) tools, CardioFreeze (CF) and a data-driven motion correction (DDMC) prototype, on LV functional and geometrical parameters. Methods: ECG-gated rest/stress [13N]NH3 PET/CT scans from forty patients with myocardial ischemia and thirty-nine patients with normal myocardial perfusion were included. The following four reconstructions were performed for each patient scan: without motion correction (NMC), with CF, DDMC, and DDMC & CF. Images were processed with Cedars-Sinai QPET software. Results: End-diastolic volume (EDV) in rest and stress increased significantly using DDMC. End-systolic volume (ESV) increased significantly, while LV ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased significantly using any MC tool, regardless of the phase. Shape index end-systole (SI ES) and shape-index end-diastole (SI ED) increased significantly when using MC, except for SI ED in rest, where DDMC did not cause any difference. Eccentricity index end-systole (ECC ES) in rest and stress increased significantly in patients with normal myocardial perfusion, while it did not differ in ischemic patients after applying MC. Conclusions: MC tools significantly increase ESV values and decrease EF values. The highest effect is observed with the combined use of DDMC & CF. Image quality is greatly improved when using MC, regardless of the method, particularly in patients with the highest myocardial displacement.
More Related Videos
05:32Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
Published on: February 21, 2025
06:53Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
Published on: July 23, 2020