Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
Published on: November 14, 2025
Assessing the Diagnostic Performance of a Smart Bra Using Temperature and Bioimpedance for Breast Cancer Detection: A
Anne-Sophie Belmont1, Marie-Valérie Moreno2, Eloise Aubret1
1Plateforme Transversale de Recherche Clinique de l'Institut de Cancérologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
Researchers tested a new wearable smart bra that uses heat sensors and electrical measurements to help detect breast abnormalities. This initial human study found that the device could distinguish between healthy tissue and lesions with promising accuracy, suggesting it may eventually serve as a helpful addition to standard screening methods like mammograms.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging and diagnostic technology within breast cancer research
- Wearable sensor integration for physiological monitoring and thermography applications
Background:
Current screening protocols for breast malignancies often face significant limitations regarding sensitivity in younger populations. Dense tissue structures frequently obscure diagnostic clarity during standard radiological examinations. Interval cancers also remain difficult to identify using traditional imaging modalities alone. This gap motivated the development of non-invasive, wearable monitoring technologies. The PHI-BRA system integrates thermal and electrical sensing to provide frequent, longitudinal assessments. Prior research has shown that metabolic changes in tumor microenvironments often manifest as localized temperature variations. That uncertainty drove the need for a device capable of capturing these subtle physiological signals outside of clinical settings. No prior work had resolved the feasibility of deploying this specific multimodal wearable in a human cohort.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the PHI-BRA system in human subjects. Researchers sought to determine if the device could effectively differentiate between individuals with and without breast lesions. The team addressed the limitations of current screening methods, which often struggle with dense tissue and interval cancers. By combining thermal and electrical sensing, the authors investigated a novel approach to frequent breast monitoring. This work was motivated by the need for non-invasive, accessible screening alternatives for younger women. The study design focused on establishing a robust discrimination model using a calibration cohort. Investigators also intended to compare the device's output against standard mammography results. This research provides an initial assessment of the safety and clinical potential of the wearable platform.
Main Methods:
Investigators performed a prospective feasibility study between March 2023 and February 2024. The research team utilized a calibration group of 15 subjects to establish the initial discrimination model. An analysis cohort consisting of 26 participants followed this phase to test the system. Half of the analysis group presented with confirmed breast lesions, while the remainder served as controls. Thermal and electrical signals were gathered directly from the wearable device during the sessions. Analysts applied receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the diagnostic efficacy of the collected data. Mammography served as the reference standard for all comparative assessments conducted throughout the trial. The team monitored all participants for potential adverse events to ensure the safety of the wearable technology.
Main Results:
The temperature-based model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 80.8% within the analysis cohort. Researchers calculated a sensitivity of 84.6% at the optimal threshold for this model. The specificity reached 76.9% during the same evaluation period. Exploratory bioimpedance analyses yielded high specificity but demonstrated lower sensitivity than the thermal measurements. Sensor contact stability emerged as the primary factor limiting the performance of the bioimpedance data. No adverse events occurred during the testing of the wearable system. The 95% confidence intervals for the temperature model sensitivity ranged from 61.5% to 100%. Specificity for the temperature model showed a 95% confidence interval between 53.8% and 100%.
Conclusions:
This initial human investigation confirms the practical feasibility of utilizing wearable thermal monitoring for identifying breast lesions. The findings suggest that such systems are safe for patient use during preliminary testing phases. Authors propose that the device could function as a supportive tool alongside established screening programs. Future clinical validation remains necessary to refine the diagnostic accuracy of the multimodal platform. The data indicate that temperature-based models currently outperform bioimpedance metrics in this specific configuration. Researchers emphasize that sensor stability is a primary factor influencing the performance of electrical measurements. The study provides a foundation for developing more robust, non-invasive screening alternatives for diverse patient groups. These results highlight the potential for wearable technology to enhance early detection strategies in clinical practice.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that the temperature-based model achieves an area under the ROC curve of 80.8%. This performance metric indicates the device's ability to distinguish between participants with breast lesions and those without, compared to the reference standard of mammography.
The device utilizes a combination of thermal sensors and bioimpedance technology. While the temperature-based approach showed higher sensitivity, the bioimpedance component was primarily limited by challenges regarding sensor contact stability during the monitoring process.
The researchers note that sensor contact stability is a technical necessity for accurate bioimpedance readings. This factor currently limits the sensitivity of the electrical measurements compared to the thermal data collected by the system.
The study employed a calibration cohort of 15 individuals to define the discrimination model. Subsequently, an analysis cohort of 26 participants, split evenly between those with and without lesions, provided the data for evaluating diagnostic performance.
The temperature-based model demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 76.9%. In contrast, the exploratory bioimpedance analysis yielded lower sensitivity but maintained high specificity during the evaluation of the participants.
The authors propose that this wearable system could serve as a complementary tool to existing screening strategies. They suggest that further clinical validation is required to confirm these preliminary findings regarding safety and diagnostic utility.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Axilla
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and put on clean gloves to maintain infection control and prevent cross-contamination.
Step 2: Prepare the patient by explaining the procedure to ensure understanding and cooperation. Ensure privacy, expose the axilla, and inform the patient that minimal movement is crucial for an accurate reading.
Step 3: Adjust the patient’s clothing to expose only the axilla. It minimizes...
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's forehead...
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
Assessing Body Temperature - Oral
Step 1:
Start by practicing proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of microorganisms.
Step 2:
Take the thermometer out of the charging unit, switch it on, and wait for the ready sign.
Step 3:
Gently slide the probe cover until a click is heard. This simple action prevents cross-contamination and ensures the correct placement of the probe cover.
Step 4:
Instruct the patient to open their mouth and place...
Assessing Body Temperature - Tympanic membrane
Step 1: Begin by practicing good hand hygiene to prevent the transmission of microorganisms.
Step 2: Turn on the thermometer and wait until the ready sign appears on the screen to ensure accurate measurement.
Step 3: Slide the probe cover in place to prevent cross-contamination.
Step 4: Instruct the patient to tilt their head to the side for comfort and check for cerumen...

